Literature DB >> 15259664

An extensive log-file analysis of step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy segment delivery errors.

Anthony M Stell1, Jonathan G Li, Omar A Zeidan, James F Dempsey.   

Abstract

We present a study to evaluate the monitor unit (MU), dosimetric, and leaf-motion errors found in the delivery of 91 step-and-shoot IMRT treatment plans performed at three nominal dose rates using a dual modality high energy Linac (Varian 2100 C/D, Varian Medical Systems Inc., Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a 120-leaf multileaf collimator (MLC). The analysis was performed by studying log files generated by the MLC controller system. Recent studies by our group have validated that the automatically generated MLC log files accurately record the actual system delivery. A total of 635 beams were delivered at three nominal dose rates: 100, 300, and 600 MU/min. The log files were manually retrieved and analysis software was developed to extract the recorded MU delivery and leaf positions for each segment. Our analysis revealed that the magnitude of segment MU errors were independent of the planned segment MUs. Segment MU errors were found to increase with dose rate having maximum errors per segment of +/-1.8 MU at 600 MU/min, +/-0.8 MU at 300 MU/min, and +/-0.5 MU at 100 MU/min. The total absolute MU error in each plan was observed to increase with the number of plan segments, with the trend increasing more rapidly for higher dose rates. Three dimensional dose distributions were recomputed based on the observed segment MU errors for three plans with large cumulative absolute MU errors. Comparison with the original treatment plans indicated no clinically significant consequences due to these errors. In addition, approximately 80% of the total segment deliveries reported at least one collimator leaf moving at least 1 mm (projected at isocenter) during segment delivery. Such errors occur near the end of segment delivery and have been previously observed by our group using a fast video-based electronic portal imaging device. At 600 MU/min, between 5% and 23% of the plan MUs were delivered during leaf motion that had exceeded a 1 mm position tolerance. These leaf motion errors were not included in the treatment plan recalculations performed in this study.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15259664     DOI: 10.1118/1.1751011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  31 in total

1.  Quality assurance of dynamic parameters in volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  A Manikandan; B Sarkar; R Holla; T R Vivek; N Sujatha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dose verification for respiratory-gated volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Jianguo Qian; Lei Xing; Wu Liu; Gary Luxton
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The use of EPID-measured leaf sequence files for IMRT dose reconstruction in adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Louis Lee; Weihua Mao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Beam rate influence on dose distribution and fluence map in IMRT dynamic technique.

Authors:  Krzysztof Slosarek; Aleksandra Grządziel; Wojciech Osewski; Lukasz Dolla; Barbara Bekman; Borislava Petrovic
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-02-10

5.  The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management.

Authors:  M Saiful Huq; Benedick A Fraass; Peter B Dunscombe; John P Gibbons; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Arno J Mundt; Sasa Mutic; Jatinder R Palta; Frank Rath; Bruce R Thomadsen; Jeffrey F Williamson; Ellen D Yorke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Patient-specific quality assurance for the delivery of (60)Co intensity modulated radiation therapy subject to a 0.35-T lateral magnetic field.

Authors:  H Harold Li; Vivian L Rodriguez; Olga L Green; Yanle Hu; Rojano Kashani; H Omar Wooten; Deshan Yang; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Dose verification of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) by use of in-treatment linac parameters.

Authors:  Akihiro Haga; Akira Sakumi; Yukari Okano; Saori Itoh; Naoya Saotome; Satoshi Kida; Hiroshi Igaki; Kenshiro Shiraishi; Hideomi Yamashita; Kuni Ohtomo; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-03-12

8.  Leakage-Penumbra effect in intensity modulated radiation therapy step-and-shoot dose delivery.

Authors:  Grigor N Grigorov; James Cl Chow
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

9.  Is RapidArc more susceptible to delivery uncertainties than dynamic IMRT?

Authors:  Gregory T Betzel; Byong Yong Yi; Ying Niu; Cedric X Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.506

10.  Radiobiological model-based bio-anatomical quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Park; Jeong-Woo Lee; Jin-Beom Chung; Kyoung-Sik Choi; Yon-Lae Kim; Byung-Moon Park; Youhyun Kim; Jungmin Kim; Jonghak Choi; Jae-Sung Kim; Semie Hong; Tae-Suk Suh
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.