BACKGROUND: The pharyngoesophageal segment commonly referred to as the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) generates a high-pressure zone (HPZ) between the pharynx and the esophagus. However, the exact anatomical components of the UES-HPZ remain incompletely determined. OBJECTIVE: To systematically define the US signature of various components of the pharyngoesophageal junction and to determine how these structures contribute to the development of the UES-HPZ. DESIGN: Prospective, experimental study. SETTING: Tertiary Academic Medical Center. PATIENTS: This study involved 18 healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION: We studied 5 participants by using a high-frequency US miniprobe (US-MP) and concurrent fluoroscopy and another 13 participants by using the US-MP and concurrent manometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Relative contribution of various muscles in the UES-HPZ. RESULTS: Manometrically, the UES-HPZ had a median length of 4.0 cm (range 3.0-4.5 cm). A C-shaped muscle, believed to represent the cricopharyngeus muscle, was observed for a median length of 3.5 cm (range 2.0-4.0 cm). The oval configuration representing the esophageal contribution to the UES was seen in 10 of 13 participants (77%) at the distal HPZ (esophagus to UES transition zone). The flat configuration of the inferior constrictor muscle was noted in 7 of 13 participants (54%) at the proximal HPZ (UES to pharynx transition zone). There were 4 to 5 wall layers versus 3 layers in the distal and proximal HPZ, respectively. The mean (+/- SD) muscle thickness was relatively constant along the length of the UES-HPZ. LIMITATIONS: Air artifacts in the UES-HPZ. CONCLUSION: The configuration and layers of the UES-HPZ vary along its length. The upper esophagus is a significant contributor to the distal UES-HPZ. Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The pharyngoesophageal segment commonly referred to as the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) generates a high-pressure zone (HPZ) between the pharynx and the esophagus. However, the exact anatomical components of the UES-HPZ remain incompletely determined. OBJECTIVE: To systematically define the US signature of various components of the pharyngoesophageal junction and to determine how these structures contribute to the development of the UES-HPZ. DESIGN: Prospective, experimental study. SETTING: Tertiary Academic Medical Center. PATIENTS: This study involved 18 healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION: We studied 5 participants by using a high-frequency US miniprobe (US-MP) and concurrent fluoroscopy and another 13 participants by using the US-MP and concurrent manometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Relative contribution of various muscles in the UES-HPZ. RESULTS: Manometrically, the UES-HPZ had a median length of 4.0 cm (range 3.0-4.5 cm). A C-shaped muscle, believed to represent the cricopharyngeus muscle, was observed for a median length of 3.5 cm (range 2.0-4.0 cm). The oval configuration representing the esophageal contribution to the UES was seen in 10 of 13 participants (77%) at the distal HPZ (esophagus to UES transition zone). The flat configuration of the inferior constrictor muscle was noted in 7 of 13 participants (54%) at the proximal HPZ (UES to pharynx transition zone). There were 4 to 5 wall layers versus 3 layers in the distal and proximal HPZ, respectively. The mean (+/- SD) muscle thickness was relatively constant along the length of the UES-HPZ. LIMITATIONS: Air artifacts in the UES-HPZ. CONCLUSION: The configuration and layers of the UES-HPZ vary along its length. The upper esophagus is a significant contributor to the distal UES-HPZ. Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Larry S Miller; Qing Dai; Brett A Sweitzer; Vinod Thangada; Joseph K Kim; Beje Thomas; Henry Parkman; Ahmed M Soliman Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: J B Liu; L S Miller; B B Goldberg; R I Feld; A A Alexander; L Needleman; D O Castell; P J Klenn; C L Millward Journal: Radiology Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Larry Miller; Pere Clavé; Ricard Farré; Begoña Lecea; Michael R Ruggieri; Ann Ouyang; Julie Regan; Barry P McMahon Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Lucie F Calderon; Meredith Kline; Marc Hersh; Kevin P Shah; Suprateek Kundu; Andrew Tkaczuk; Nancy McColloch; AnS Jain Journal: J Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2022-07-30 Impact factor: 4.725