Literature DB >> 2382723

Determinants of upper esophageal sphincter pressure in dogs.

P Jacob1, P J Kahrilas, G Herzon, B McLaughlin.   

Abstract

Chronic experiments were done on six dogs fitted with EMG electrodes on pharyngeal and esophageal musculature. Electromyographic activity of the cricopharyngeus was recorded in awake and sedated animals with and without manometric recordings as well as during esophageal distension. Intraluminal upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure had two distinct components; active contraction accompanied by cricopharyngeal EMG activity and passive elasticity that persisted in the absence of EMG activity. Between swallows, the cricopharyngeal EMG activity patterns observed were of either tonic activity, no activity, or phasic activity with inspiratory bursts. The activity level was markedly affected by anesthesia, phonating, whining, panting, level of alertness, or changes in head posture. A brisk UES contraction was elicited in response to passage of the manometric assembly and to intraesophageal balloon distension. Persistent EMG augmentation after stationing of the manometric sensor suggested that intraluminal manometry tends to exaggerate resting sphincter pressure. We conclude that electrical activity of the cricopharyngeus, and by inference UES pressure, is markedly affected by many variables that are difficult to control during clinical or experimental determinations of UES pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2382723     DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1990.259.2.G245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  15 in total

Review 1.  An overview of the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  I M Lang; R Shaker
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-06

2.  Evaluation of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) using simultaneous high-resolution endoluminal sonography (HRES) and manometry.

Authors:  Larry S Miller; Qing Dai; Brett A Sweitzer; Vinod Thangada; Joseph K Kim; Beje Thomas; Henry Parkman; Ahmed M Soliman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Quantifying contributions of the cricopharyngeus to upper esophageal sphincter pressure changes by means of intramuscular electromyography and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Corinne A Jones; Michael J Hammer; Matthew R Hoffman; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 4.  Airway protective mechanisms: current concepts.

Authors:  R Shaker
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 5.  The use of intraluminal manometry to assess upper esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  B T Massey
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  An update on the physiology of the components of the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  I M Lang; R Shaker
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  Cricopharyngeal function and dysfunction.

Authors:  I J Cook
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Swallowing performance in patients with vocal fold motion impairment.

Authors:  J A Wilson; A Pryde; A White; L Maher; A G Maran
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  [Physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter].

Authors:  M Jungheim; S Miller; D Kühn; C Schwemmle; J P Schneider; M Ochs; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Repetitive contractions of the upper esophageal body and sphincter in achalasia.

Authors:  Z G Zhang; N E Diamant
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.