Literature DB >> 15256514

Haplotype and missing data inference in nuclear families.

Shin Lin1, Aravinda Chakravarti, David J Cutler.   

Abstract

Determining linkage phase from population samples with statistical methods is accurate only within regions of high linkage disequilibrium (LD). Yet, affected individuals in a genetic mapping study, including those involving cases and controls, may share sequences identical-by-descent stretching on the order of 10s to 100s of kilobases, quite possibly over regions of low LD in the population. At the same time, inferring phase from nuclear families may be hampered by missing family members, missing genotypes, and the noninformativity of certain genotype patterns. In this study, we reformulate our previous haplotype reconstruction algorithm, and its associated computer program, to phase parents with information derived from population samples as well as from their offspring. In applications of our algorithm to 100-kb stretches, simulated in accordance to a Wright-Fisher model with typical levels of LD in humans, we find that phase reconstruction for 160 trios with 10% missing data is highly accurate (>90%) over the entire length. Furthermore, our algorithm can estimate allelic status for missing data at high accuracy (>95%). Finally, the input capacity of the program is vast, easily handling thousands of segregating sites in > or = 1000 chromosomes. Copyright 2004 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15256514      PMCID: PMC509272          DOI: 10.1101/gr.2204604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  38 in total

1.  Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation.

Authors:  Richard R Hudson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Caution on pedigree haplotype inference with software that assumes linkage equilibrium.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Shannon K McDonnell; Liang Wang; Julie M Cunningham; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Haplotype inference in random population samples.

Authors:  Shin Lin; David J Cutler; Michael E Zwick; Aravinda Chakravarti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data.

Authors:  Matthew Stephens; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A first-generation linkage disequilibrium map of human chromosome 22.

Authors:  Elisabeth Dawson; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Suzannah Bumpstead; Yuan Chen; Sarah Hunt; David M Beare; Jagjit Pabial; Thomas Dibling; Emma Tinsley; Susan Kirby; David Carter; Marianna Papaspyridonos; Simon Livingstone; Rocky Ganske; Elin Lõhmussaar; Jana Zernant; Neeme Tõnisson; Maido Remm; Reedik Mägi; Tarmo Puurand; Jaak Vilo; Ants Kurg; Kate Rice; Panos Deloukas; Richard Mott; Andres Metspalu; David R Bentley; Lon R Cardon; Ian Dunham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Modeling linkage disequilibrium and identifying recombination hotspots using single-nucleotide polymorphism data.

Authors:  Na Li; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Nonparametric disequilibrium mapping of functional sites using haplotypes of multiple tightly linked single-nucleotide polymorphism markers.

Authors:  Rong Cheng; Jennie Z Ma; Fred A Wright; Shili Lin; Xin Gao; Daolong Wang; Robert C Elston; Ming D Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Relative efficiency of ambiguous vs. directly measured haplotype frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Efficiency of haplotype frequency estimation when nuclear family information is included.

Authors:  Tim Becker; Michael Knapp
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 10.  Haplotype blocks and linkage disequilibrium in the human genome.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 53.242

View more
  15 in total

1.  Accounting for decay of linkage disequilibrium in haplotype inference and missing-data imputation.

Authors:  Matthew Stephens; Paul Scheet
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Detecting genome wide haplotype sharing using SNP or microsatellite haplotype data.

Authors:  Melanie Bahlo; Jim Stankovich; Terence P Speed; Justin P Rubio; Rachel K Burfoot; Simon J Foote
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  A comparison of phasing algorithms for trios and unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Jonathan Marchini; David Cutler; Nick Patterson; Matthew Stephens; Eleazar Eskin; Eran Halperin; Shin Lin; Zhaohui S Qin; Heather M Munro; Goncalo R Abecasis; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Methods to impute missing genotypes for population data.

Authors:  Zhaoxia Yu; Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  ACKR1 Alleles at 5.6 kb in a Well-Characterized Renewable US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Reference Panel for Standardization of Blood Group Genotyping.

Authors:  Kshitij Srivastava; Pavel P Khil; Emilia Sippert; Evgeniya Volkova; John P Dekker; Maria Rios; Willy A Flegel
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 6.  Haplotyping methods for pedigrees.

Authors:  Guimin Gao; David B Allison; Ina Hoeschele
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 7.  A comprehensive literature review of haplotyping software and methods for use with unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Rany M Salem; Jennifer Wessel; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.639

8.  An integrative variant analysis pipeline for accurate genotype/haplotype inference in population NGS data.

Authors:  Yi Wang; James Lu; Jin Yu; Richard A Gibbs; Fuli Yu
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  A haplotype inference algorithm for trios based on deterministic sampling.

Authors:  Alexandros Iliadis; John Watkinson; Dimitris Anastassiou; Xiaodong Wang
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Inferring haplotypes and parental genotypes in larger full sib-ships and other pedigrees with missing or erroneous genotype data.

Authors:  Carl Nettelblad
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.