Literature DB >> 12446986

Efficiency of haplotype frequency estimation when nuclear family information is included.

Tim Becker1, Michael Knapp.   

Abstract

In genetic studies the haplotype structure of the regarded population is expected to carry important information. Experimental methods to derive haplotypes, however, are expensive and none of them has yet become standard methodology. On the other hand, maximum likelihood haplotype estimation from unphased individual genotypes may incur inaccuracies. We therefore investigated the relative efficiency of haplotype frequency estimation when nuclear family information is included compared to estimation from experimentally derived haplotypes. Efficiency was measured in terms of variance ratios of the estimates. The variances were derived from the binomial distribution for experimentally derived haplotypes, and from the Fisher information matrix corresponding to the general likelihood function of the haplotype frequency parameters, including family information. We subsequently compared these variance ratios to the variance ratios for the case of estimation from individual genotypes. We found that the information gained from a single child compensates missing phase information to a high degree, resulting in estimates almost as reliable as those derived from observed haplotypes. Thus, if children have already been genotyped for other reasons, it is highly recommendable to include them into the estimation. If child information is not already present, it depends on the number of loci and the haplotype diversity if it is useful to genotype a single child just to reduce phase ambiguity. In general, if the number of loci is less than or equal to three or if the number of haplotypes with a frequency >5% is less than or equal to four, haplotype estimation from individuals is quite good already and the improvement gained from a single child can not compensate the genotyping effort for it. On the other hand, under scenarios with many loci and high haplotype diversity, haplotype frequency estimation from trios can be more efficient than haplotype frequency estimation from individuals also on a per genotype base. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12446986     DOI: 10.1159/000066692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  11 in total

1.  Entropy-based SNP selection for genetic association studies.

Authors:  Jochen Hampe; Stefan Schreiber; Michael Krawczak
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Haplotype and missing data inference in nuclear families.

Authors:  Shin Lin; Aravinda Chakravarti; David J Cutler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  A powerful strategy to account for multiple testing in the context of haplotype analysis.

Authors:  Tim Becker; Michael Knapp
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The impact of using related individuals for haplotype reconstruction in population studies.

Authors:  Michael T Schouten; Christopher K I Williams; Chris S Haley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A new method for haplotype inference including full-sib information.

Authors:  Xiang Dong Ding; Henner Simianer; Qin Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Hapl-o-Mat: open-source software for HLA haplotype frequency estimation from ambiguous and heterogeneous data.

Authors:  Christian Schäfer; Alexander H Schmidt; Jürgen Sauter
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  A comprehensive literature review of haplotyping software and methods for use with unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Rany M Salem; Jennifer Wessel; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.639

8.  A survey of current software for haplotype phase inference.

Authors:  Michael E Weale
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.639

9.  A novel tool for individual haplotype inference using mixed data.

Authors:  Chen-Pang Lin; Cathy S J Fann
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 8.410

10.  Efficacy assessment of SNP sets for genome-wide disease association studies.

Authors:  Andreas Wollstein; Alexander Herrmann; Michael Wittig; Michael Nothnagel; Andre Franke; Peter Nürnberg; Stefan Schreiber; Michael Krawczak; Jochen Hampe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.