Literature DB >> 15248053

Marginal and internal adaptation of Class II ormocer and hybrid resin composite restorations before and after load cycling.

N Kournetas1, M Chakmakchi, A Kakaboura, C Rahiotis, J Geis-Gerstorfer.   

Abstract

To overcome the shortcomings of the conventional composite restorative materials, ormocer materials have been introduced over the past few years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal and internal adaptation of two ormocer restorative systems (Admira, Voco and Definite, Degussa) compared to a hybrid composite one (TPH Spectrum, Dentsply/ DeTrey), before and after load cycling in Class II restorations. Standardized Class II restorations with cervical margins on enamel were divided into three groups ( n=16). Teeth of each group were filled with one of the restoratives tested and its respective bonding agent. Each group was divided into two equal subgroups. The marginal and internal adaptation of the first subgroup was evaluated after 7-day water storage at room temperature and of the second after cyclic loading in a mastication simulator (1.2x10(6) cycles, 49 N, 1.6 Hz). The occlusal and cervical marginal evaluation was conducted by videomicroscope and ranked as "excellent" and "not excellent". One thin section (150 microm), in mesial-distal direction, of each restoration, was examined under metallographic microscope to determine the quality of internal adaptation. The occlusal and cervical adaptation of both ormocer restorative systems was similar and clearly worse compared with the hybrid composite restorative one before as well as after load cycling. Concerning internal adaptation, no gap-free ormocer restorations were detected, whereas all Spectrum restorations presented perfect adaptation. The bonding agents of the ormocers formed layers with unacceptable features (pores, fractures) whereas that of the hybrid composite achieved perfect bonding layer even after loading. The rheological characteristics of the bonding agents of the ormocer restorative systems are proposed to be responsible for their inferior marginal and internal quality in Class II restorations compared with the hybrid composite one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15248053     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-004-0274-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  42 in total

1.  Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins.

Authors:  H Y Chen; J Manhart; R Hickel; K H Kunzelmann
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Lifetime-limiting strength degradation from contact fatigue in dental ceramics.

Authors:  Y G Jung; I M Peterson; D K Kim; B R Lawn
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  The use of flowable composites as filled adhesives.

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Manuela Lopes; Jorge Perdigão; Wallace W Ambrose; Bruno T Rosa
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 4.  Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations.

Authors:  B Van Meerbeek; M Vargas; S Inoue; Y Yoshida; J Perdigão; P Lambrechts; G Vanherle
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations.

Authors:  J Manhart; H Y Chen; R Hickel
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Marginal gap formation of composites in dentine: effect of water storage.

Authors:  A U J Yap; K C Shah; C L Chew
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 7.  Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.

Authors:  J F Roulet
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Knoop hardness depth profiles and compressive strength of selected dental composites polymerized with halogen and LED light curing technologies.

Authors:  Alexander Uhl; Robin W Mills; Richard W Vowles; Klaus D Jandt
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002

9.  Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins: two-year results.

Authors:  L G Lopes; D F G Cefaly; E B Franco; R F L Mondelli; J R P Lauris; M F L Navarro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  The influence of plasma arc vs. halogen standard or soft-start irradiation on polymerization shrinkage kinetics of polymer matrix composites.

Authors:  Norbert Hofmann; Walter Denner; Burkard Hugo; Bernd Klaiber
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Interfacial and surface characterization of two self-etching adhesive systems and a total-etch adhesive after bonding to ground and unground bovine enamel--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Gabriela Ibarra; Marcos A Vargas; Werner Geurtsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vitro investigation of the performance of different restorative materials under cast circumferential clasps for removable dental prostheses.

Authors:  Peter Pospiech; Florian Nagel; Florian Gebhart; Frank P Nothdurft; Gergo Mitov
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.