Literature DB >> 12878021

The influence of plasma arc vs. halogen standard or soft-start irradiation on polymerization shrinkage kinetics of polymer matrix composites.

Norbert Hofmann1, Walter Denner, Burkard Hugo, Bernd Klaiber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine polymerization shrinkage kinetics and hardness of photo-activated polymer matrix composites (PMC) after plasma arc vs. halogen standard or soft-start irradiation.
METHODS: Polymerization shrinkage was measured using the 'deflecting disk technique', and Knoop hardness was measured at the bottom of 1.5 mm thick specimens stored for 24 h at 37 degrees C. The materials comprised one micro-filled (Silux Plus) and four fine hybrid PMC (Definite, Herculite XRV, Solitaire 2 and Z250). The irradiation protocols included halogen standard irradiation at three intensities (TriLight, ESPE), ramp curing (dito), step curing (HiLight, ESPE), pulse polymerization (VIP Light, BISCO) and plasma curing (Apollo 95E, DMDS; PAC Light, ADT).
RESULTS: Standard halogen irradiation at reduced intensity delayed the start and slowed down the progression of shrinkage strain, but (except for Z250) as well produced lower hardness. Soft-start halogen curing produced similar kinetics but maintained hardness. Plasma arc irradiation resulted in an immediate start and a rapid progression of polymerization contraction, but produced low hardness values in Definite (cured by the ADT unit) and in Solitaire 2 (both units). Z250 featured the highest, Silux Plus the lowest maximum rate of contraction. Despite soft-start irradiation, contraction of Z250 progressed faster than that of Silux Plus with halogen standard irradiation at high intensity.
CONCLUSIONS: Soft-start halogen irradiation protocols provide better chances for compensation of shrinkage stress by flow within PMC without compromising hardness and may contribute to a better marginal integrity of the restorations. Irradiation protocols should be individually adjusted to compensate for the different curing characteristics of PMC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12878021     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00089-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  6 in total

1.  Marginal and internal adaptation of Class II ormocer and hybrid resin composite restorations before and after load cycling.

Authors:  N Kournetas; M Chakmakchi; A Kakaboura; C Rahiotis; J Geis-Gerstorfer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The influence of "C-factor" and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of resin composite.

Authors:  Sérgio Kiyoshi Ishikiriama; Thiago Majolo Valeretto; Eduardo Batista Franco; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Shear bond strength and enamel fracture behavior of ceramic brackets Fascination® and Fascination®2.

Authors:  Robert Gittner; Ralf Müller-Hartwich; Sylvia Engel; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Bonding strength of silorane-based composite to Er-YAG laser prepared dentin.

Authors:  E Koliniotou-Koumpia; P Kouros; D Dionysopoulos; L Zafiriadis
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  The effect of rapid high-intensity light-curing on micromechanical properties of bulk-fill and conventional resin composites.

Authors:  Matej Par; Danijela Marovic; Thomas Attin; Zrinka Tarle; Tobias T Tauböck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Is the bonding of self-adhesive cement sensitive to root region and curing mode?

Authors:  Thaynara Faelly Boing; Giovana Mongruel Gomes; João Carlos Gomes; Alessandra Reis; Osnara Maria Mongruel Gomes
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.