Literature DB >> 33814858

Modified Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Groin-Negative Patients of Penile Cancer: Our Experience.

R B Nerli1, Manas Sharma1, Priyeshkumar Patel1, Shridhar C Ghagane2, Shashank D Patil1, Pulkit Gupta1, Murigendra B Hiremath3, Neeraj S Dixit2.   

Abstract

Cancer of the penis is an important health problem in India, causing significant morbidity. Involvement of locoregional lymph nodes is the most significant prognostic factor for patients with penile cancer. In this study, we reviewed clinical data of all patients who underwent modified inguinal lymph node dissection as a means to diagnose micro-metastasis in inguinal lymph nodes, and analysed the outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital clinical charts of patients treated for carcinoma of the penis. Inguinal and distant metastases were assessed by physical examination, ultrasound imaging of the inguinal region, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis and a chest radiograph. Patients with clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes underwent modified lymph node dissection (mILND) both to diagnose and stage the disease. Complications occurring during a 30-day period after surgery were defined as early and thereafter as late complications. A total of 40 patients with a mean age of 52.27±13.10 (range 25-73) years underwent mILND. Wedge biopsy from the primary lesion had revealed intermediate-risk disease in 22 (55%) patients and high-risk disease in 18 (45%) patients. Histopathological examination of the primary penile lesion revealed a pT1 lesion in 32 patients and a pT2 lesion in the remaining 8 patients. Fourteen (35%) of the 40 patients showed micro-metastases in the inguinal lymph nodes on frozen sections. The mean follow-up in these patients was 56.6±18.09 months. There were no instances of local or systemic recurrences seen in 38 (95%) patients within 5 years. Superficial lymph node dissection and where facilities are available DSLNB remain the standard of care in the management of patients with clinically groin-negative (cN0) intermediate- and high-risk groups. Modified inguinal lymph node dissection would be a safe and appropriate alternative to this in all centres that do not have access to newer modalities like DSLNB, video-endoscopic (VEIL) or robotic-assisted techniques. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinoma penis; Inguinal lymph nodes; Modified lymph node dissection; Superficial lymph node dissection

Year:  2021        PMID: 33814858      PMCID: PMC7960866          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01285-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  19 in total

1.  Long-term followup of penile carcinoma treated with penectomy and bilateral modified inguinal lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Carlos Arturo Levi d'Ancona; Roberto Gonçalves de Lucena; Fernando Augusto de Oliveira Querne; Mário Henrique Tavares Martins; Fernandes Denardi; Nelson Rodrigues Netto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  EAU penile cancer guidelines 2009.

Authors:  Giorgio Pizzocaro; Ferran Algaba; Simon Horenblas; Eduard Solsona; Silvia Tana; Hein Van Der Poel; Nicholas A Watkin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): minimally invasive resection of inguinal lymph nodes.

Authors:  M Tobias-Machado; Alessandro Tavares; Wilson R Molina; Pedro H Forseto; Roberto V Juliano; Eric R Wroclawski
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Recurrence patterns of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: recommendations for follow-up based on a two-centre analysis of 700 patients.

Authors:  Joost A P Leijte; Peter Kirrander; Ninja Antonini; Torgny Windahl; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Morbidity of modified prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Timothy R Coblentz; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Long-term follow-up after laser therapy for penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Richard P Meijer; Tom A Boon; Ger E P M van Venrooij; Carl J Wijburg
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Peniscopically controlled CO2 laser excision for conservative treatment of in situ and T1 penile carcinoma: report on 224 patients.

Authors:  Gaetano Bandieramonte; Maurizio Colecchia; Luigi Mariani; Salvatore Lo Vullo; Giorgio Pizzocaro; Luigi Piva; Nicola Nicolai; Roberto Salvioni; Valentina Lezzi; Bernardina Stefanon; Giuseppe De Palo
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Penile cancer: relation of extent of nodal metastasis to survival.

Authors:  V Srinivas; M J Morse; H W Herr; P C Sogani; W F Whitmore
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  W J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Jiasian Teh; Catriona Duncan; Liang Qu; Glen Guerra; Vignesh Narasimhan; Toan Pham; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Radioisotope-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Penile Cancer: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Lena Nemitz; Anna Vincke; Bianca Michalik; Svenja Engels; Luca-Marie Meyer; Rolf-Peter Henke; Friedhelm Wawroschek; Alexander Winter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.