Literature DB >> 16906416

[The influence of the T stage on the risk of metastasis of penis cancer: T1 vs. T2].

C M Naumann1, C van der Horst, B Volkmer, F Kurtz, F J Martinéz Portillo, C Seif, S Hautmann, P M Braun, R Hautmann, K-P Jünemann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversies persist over the therapeutic approach to T1 penile carcinoma, particularly in patients with negative inguinal lymph nodes. Available data on lymph nodes metastases (LNM) in T1 carcinoma are contradictory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the metastatic risk of T1 carcinoma and to compare it with that of T2 carcinoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 37 patients (pts) with T1 or T2 tumors were reviewed. Assessment of the inguinal lymph node condition was based on node dissection in 29 pts and surveillance in eight pts (mean 62 months, range 22-162).
RESULTS: Grading was classified as good (G1), moderate (G2) and poor (G3) in seven, 26 and four pts, respectively. Tumor stage was T1 in 21 and T2 in 16 pts. LNM were observed in eight of 21 T1 (38%) and six of 16 T2 tumors (38%). No G1 and all G3 tumors developed LNM independently of tumor stage. Ten of the 26 G2 carcinomas (38%) harboured LNM and seven of these pts (70%) had a T1 tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, the metastatic potential of T1 penile carcinoma has been underestimated in the recent literature. Tumor grading has a substantially stronger impact on the metastatic risk in T1 and T2 penile carcinoma than tumor stage, indicating a surgical lymph node staging starting at the pT1G2 stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16906416     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-006-1160-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  24 in total

1.  Long-term followup of penile carcinoma treated with penectomy and bilateral modified inguinal lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Carlos Arturo Levi d'Ancona; Roberto Gonçalves de Lucena; Fernando Augusto de Oliveira Querne; Mário Henrique Tavares Martins; Fernandes Denardi; Nelson Rodrigues Netto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of penile cancer.

Authors:  Bernhard Scher; Michael Seitz; Martin Reiser; Edwin Hungerhuber; Klaus Hahn; Reinhold Tiling; Peter Herzog; Maximilian Reiser; Peter Schneede; Stefan Dresel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma: evaluation of 10 years experience.

Authors:  Bin K Kroon; Simon Horenblas; Willem Meinhardt; Henk G van der Poel; Axel Bex; Harm van Tinteren; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Omgo E Nieweg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  The role of lymphadenectomy in penile cancer.

Authors:  Ricardo F Sánchez-Ortiz; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 5.  Advanced penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel J Culkin; Tomasz M Beer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes.

Authors:  D Theodorescu; P Russo; Z F Zhang; C Morash; W R Fair
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  p53 as a new prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis in penile carcinoma: analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Ademar Lopes; Artur Licio R Bezerra; Clovis Antonio Lopes Pinto; Sergio Vicente Serrano; Celso Abdon de MellO; Luisa Lina Villa
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Morbidity of modified prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Timothy R Coblentz; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion.

Authors:  W S McDougal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometry and traditional pathologic variables in invasive penile carcinoma: assessment of prognostic significance.

Authors:  M C Hall; J S Sanders; F Vuitch; E Ramirez; C A Pettaway
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.