Literature DB >> 15731520

The first steps of transposable elements invasion: parasitic strategy vs. genetic drift.

Arnaud Le Rouzic1, Pierre Capy.   

Abstract

Transposable elements are often considered as selfish DNA sequences able to invade the genome of their host species. Their evolutive dynamics are complex, due to the interaction between their intrinsic amplification capacity, selection at the host level, transposition regulation, and genetic drift. Here, we propose modeling the first steps of TE invasion, i.e., just after a horizontal transfer, when a single copy is present in the genome of one individual. If the element has a constant transposition rate, it will disappear in most cases: the elements with low-transposition rate are frequently lost through genetic drift, while those with high-transposition rate may amplify, leading to the sterility of their host. Elements whose transposition rate is regulated are able to successfully invade the populations, thanks to an initial transposition burst followed by a strong limitation of their activity. Self-regulation or hybrid dysgenesis may thus represent some genome-invasion parasitic strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15731520      PMCID: PMC1449084          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.031211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  61 in total

1.  Genetic algorithm-based model of evolutionary dynamics of class II transposable elements.

Authors:  H Quesneville; D Anxolabéhère
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Selfish DNA is maladaptive: evidence from the plant Red List.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth; Helen Borthwick; Carolina Bartolomé; Patricia Pignatelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The significance of responses of the genome to challenge.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Autoregulation of mariner transposase activity by overproduction and dominant-negative complementation.

Authors:  A R Lohe; D L Hartl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Transposition rate of the 412 retrotransposable element is independent of copy number in natural populations of Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  C Vieira; C Biémont
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Factors contributing to the hybrid dysgenesis syndrome in Drosophila virilis.

Authors:  J Vieira; C P Vieira; D L Hartl; E R Lozovskaya
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Factors that affect the horizontal transfer of transposable elements.

Authors:  Joana C Silva; Elgion L Loreto; Jonathan B Clark
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.081

View more
  63 in total

1.  Tropical Africa as a cradle for horizontal transfers of transposable elements between species of the genera Drosophila and Zaprionus.

Authors:  Claudia Ma Carareto
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-09-01

2.  Population genetics models of competition between transposable element subfamilies.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Rouzic; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Applying mobile genetic elements for genome analysis and evolution.

Authors:  Wolfgang J Miller; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Long-term evolution of transposable elements.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Rouzic; Thibaud S Boutin; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Characterization of new hAT transposable elements in 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Mauro de Freitas Ortiz; Elgion Lucio Silva Loreto
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  The impact of dissociation on transposon-mediated disease control strategies.

Authors:  John M Marshall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Diversity-generating retroelements.

Authors:  Bob Medhekar; Jeff F Miller
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  Non-LTR retrotransposons in fungi.

Authors:  Olga Novikova; Victor Fet; Alexander Blinov
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.410

9.  Internal deletions of transposable elements: the case of Lemi elements.

Authors:  Abdelhakime Negoua; Jacques-Deric Rouault; Mohamed Chakir; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Distribution, evolution, and diversity of retrotransposons at the flamenco locus reflect the regulatory properties of piRNA clusters.

Authors:  Vanessa Zanni; Angéline Eymery; Michael Coiffet; Matthias Zytnicki; Isabelle Luyten; Hadi Quesneville; Chantal Vaury; Silke Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.