Literature DB >> 6805497

Predictive value of ultrasound measurement in early pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.

M J Bennett, G Little, J Dewhurst, G Chamberlain.   

Abstract

Early fetal biparietal diameter (BPD) measurements were obtained with ultrasound in 1062 women attending for antenatal care; a random half had the results withheld from the obstetricians. Of the 1026 women who were sure of the dates of their last normal menstrual period, 829 (81%) were found to have appropriate biparietal diameter measurements, in 3% the pregnancy was more than 2 weeks further advanced and in 14% more than 2 weeks less than calculated. In 30% of the women whose results were intended to be withheld, the code had to be broken because of clinical concern. There were no differences in fetal outcome (birthweight centile, Apgar score at 1 min and perinatal mortality) in the women whose BPD results were known compared with those whose results were withheld from the obstetrician. But a significantly larger number of labours were induced for suspected growth retardation when the gestational age was known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6805497     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05074.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  12 in total

Review 1.  Periodic health examination, 1992 update: 2. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Ultrasonography and perinatal mortality rates.

Authors:  D J Cahill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-16

3.  Estimations of gestational age and screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  S Holding
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-20

4.  Estimations of gestational age and screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  T M Reynolds; M D Penney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-18

Review 5.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

6.  Does routine ultrasound scanning improve outcome in pregnancy? Meta-analysis of various outcome measures.

Authors:  H C Bucher; J G Schmidt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-03

Review 7.  Fetal ultrasonography.

Authors:  S H Garmel; M E D'Alton
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-09

8.  Effects of ultrasound, shortwaves, and physical exertion on pregnancy outcome in physiotherapists.

Authors:  H Taskinen; P Kyyrönen; K Hemminki
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Case-control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speech.

Authors:  J D Campbell; R W Elford; R F Brant
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; Clare Mullan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.