Literature DB >> 6146762

Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy.

L S Bakketeig, S H Eik-Nes, G Jacobsen, M K Ulstein, C J Brodtkorb, P Balstad, B C Eriksen, N P Jörgensen.   

Abstract

510 of 1009 pregnant women in the Trondheim area (Norway) were randomly selected for ultrasound examination at the 19th and 32nd weeks of pregnancy in addition to routine antenatal care. Among the screened women, twins were diagnosed earlier and there were slightly fewer post-term inductions (2.8% versus 4.0%) and fewer low-weight births (2.2% versus 3.6% less than 2500 g), but none of these differences was statistically significant. There were no differences in the condition of the newborn. Small-for-gestational-age births were more often diagnosed antenatally in the screened group and the mothers received more active treatment. During pregnancy, screened women were admitted to hospital more often than unscreened women (15.5% versus 9.2%). The study revealed no adverse short-term biological effects from ultrasound. The cost of the screening programme, including associated costs such as extra hospital admissions, was about US$ 250 per pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6146762     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90492-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  19 in total

Review 1.  Periodic health examination, 1992 update: 2. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Obstetric ultrasound in family practice: the effect of on-site ultrasound facilities.

Authors:  R P Strasser; M J Bass
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Ultrasonic imaging: safety considerations.

Authors:  Gail Ter Haar
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 4.  Prenatal diagnosis of common genetic disorders.

Authors:  M D Crawfurd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988 Aug 20-27

5.  Does the Use of Diagnostic Technology Reduce Fetal Mortality?

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Irene Skau; Rune Sørensen; Anne Eskild
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

7.  Routine ultrasound scanning in pregnancy. The benefits are clinical ... and psychological.

Authors:  J C Konje; R de Chazal; D J Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-28

8.  Does routine ultrasound scanning improve outcome in pregnancy? Meta-analysis of various outcome measures.

Authors:  H C Bucher; J G Schmidt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-03

9.  Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development.

Authors:  K A Salvesen; L J Vatten; S H Eik-Nes; K Hugdahl; L S Bakketeig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17

10.  Regulation of lipolysis during the neonatal period. Importance of thyrotropin.

Authors:  C Marcus; H Ehrén; P Bolme; P Arner
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.