RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated different stent grafts by 3 T magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with respect to lumen visibility, susceptibility-induced signal loss, and type of stent artifacts compared with 1.5 T MRA in a phantom model. METHODS: Six different stent-grafts (tube: n = 3, bifurcated: n = 3) were evaluated by 3 T and 1.5 T MRA using a tube phantom. MRA was performed using T1-weighted sequences at both systems with comparable parameters (3T: TR 5.4/TE 2.0/FA 30 degrees, 1.5 T: TR 6.2/TE 2.2/FA 30 degrees). A blind study of the image quality, including artifacts, was performed by 3 radiologists. Furthermore, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: One Elgiloy stent graft showed almost a complete intraluminal signal loss at 1.5 and 3 T. All other models could be evaluated by both systems by MRA, resulting in a favorable lumen visibility (score: 1) for prostheses made of nitinol. Scores for overall image quality and artifacts were the same for both MR systems. SNR and CNR values of the stented part of the vessel phantom increased from 320 +/- 33 to 618 +/- 40 and from 306 +/- 34 to 596 +/- 40 at 3 T when compared with 1.5 T, resulting in a significant signal gain of 93% at the higher field strength. CONCLUSIONS: 3 Tesla MRA of aortic stent grafts in a phantom model demonstrates an increase in SNR and CNR when compared with 1.5 T. However, the magnitude of imaging artifacts as well as coherent intraluminal signal loss within the stent does not increase equally in both MR systems.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated different stent grafts by 3 T magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with respect to lumen visibility, susceptibility-induced signal loss, and type of stent artifacts compared with 1.5 T MRA in a phantom model. METHODS: Six different stent-grafts (tube: n = 3, bifurcated: n = 3) were evaluated by 3 T and 1.5 T MRA using a tube phantom. MRA was performed using T1-weighted sequences at both systems with comparable parameters (3T: TR 5.4/TE 2.0/FA 30 degrees, 1.5 T: TR 6.2/TE 2.2/FA 30 degrees). A blind study of the image quality, including artifacts, was performed by 3 radiologists. Furthermore, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: One Elgiloy stent graft showed almost a complete intraluminal signal loss at 1.5 and 3 T. All other models could be evaluated by both systems by MRA, resulting in a favorable lumen visibility (score: 1) for prostheses made of nitinol. Scores for overall image quality and artifacts were the same for both MR systems. SNR and CNR values of the stented part of the vessel phantom increased from 320 +/- 33 to 618 +/- 40 and from 306 +/- 34 to 596 +/- 40 at 3 T when compared with 1.5 T, resulting in a significant signal gain of 93% at the higher field strength. CONCLUSIONS: 3 Tesla MRA of aortic stent grafts in a phantom model demonstrates an increase in SNR and CNR when compared with 1.5 T. However, the magnitude of imaging artifacts as well as coherent intraluminal signal loss within the stent does not increase equally in both MR systems.
Authors: Volker Rasche; Alexander Oberhuber; Stephan Trumpp; Axel Bornstedt; Karl-Heinz Orend; Nico Merkle; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Martin Hoffmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael Lettau; Annett Sauer; Sabine Heiland; Stefan Rohde; Julia Reinhardt; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Matthias C Burg; Alexander C Bunck; Harald Seifarth; Boris Buerke; Harald Kugel; Volker Hesselmann; Michael Köhler; Walter Heindel; David Maintz Journal: Radiol Res Pract Date: 2010-07-27