Literature DB >> 16703314

MR liver imaging and cholangiography in the presence of surgical metallic clips at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

Elmar M Merkle1, Brian M Dale, John Thomas, Erik K Paulson.   

Abstract

To evaluate whether clips from prior cholecystectomy impair image quality during magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) at 3 Tesla (T) compared with 1.5 T, surgical clips were embedded in a gel phantom and positioned at predefined distances from a fluid-filled tube designed to simulate the bile duct. The maximum clip distance was noted where susceptibility artifacts obscured the fluid-filled tube at 1.5 T and 3 T. Susceptibility artifact size was calculated for each sequence within each magnet class. In vivo analysis included 42 patients postcholecystectomy who underwent MRC at either 1.5 T or 3 T. In vitro, mean area of susceptibility artifacts was 104 mm2 on 3-T and 75 mm2 on 1.5-T MR imaging (MRI). While surgical clips within a 2-mm range impaired visualization of the fluid-filled tube on 1.5-T MRI, this range increased to 4 mm on 3-T MRI. In vivo, MRC image quality was impaired by susceptibility artifacts in three of 21 cases at 3 T and in two of 21 cases at 1.5 T. Overall, biliary pseudo-obstructions due to susceptibility artifacts from cholecystectomy surgical clips were not substantially more common on 3-T MRC in clinical practice, and patients with a history of prior cholecystectomy should not be excluded from a 3-T MRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16703314     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0234-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  16 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  M A Barish; E K Yucel; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography of endovascular aortic stent grafts: phantom measurements in comparison with 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Stefan C Krämer; Alexander Wall; David Maintz; Rainald Bachmann; Harald Kugel; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 3.  MRCP pitfalls.

Authors:  L Van Hoe; K Mermuys; P Vanhoenacker
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2004 May-Jun

4.  RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Hansjörg Graf; Ulrike A Lauer; Alexander Berger; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  3.0- Versus 1.5-T MR cholangiography: a pilot study.

Authors:  E M Merkle; P A Haugan; J Thomas; T A Jaffe; C Gullotto
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla.

Authors:  C Frahm; H B Gehl; U H Melchert; H D Weiss
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws.

Authors:  C A Petersilge; J S Lewin; J L Duerk; J U Yoo; A J Ghaneyem
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Diagnostic pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of the biliary tract and gallbladder.

Authors:  Y Watanabe; M Dohke; T Ishimori; Y Amoh; A Okumura; K Oda; S Koike; Y Dodo
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation.

Authors:  J S Lewin; J L Duerk; V R Jain; C A Petersilge; C P Chao; J R Haaga
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Sensitivity of T2-weighted FSE sequences towards physiological iron depositions in normal brains at 1.5 and 3.0 T.

Authors:  T Allkemper; W Schwindt; D Maintz; W Heindel; B Tombach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian M Buck; Bernhard Jost; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Technical Failure of MR Elastography Examinations of the Liver: Experience from a Large Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Mathilde Wagner; Idoia Corcuera-Solano; Grace Lo; Steven Esses; Joseph Liao; Cecilia Besa; Nelson Chen; Ginu Abraham; Maggie Fung; James S Babb; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for metallic surgical implants: findings applied to 61 additional skin closure staples and vessel ligation clips.

Authors:  Amreeta Gill; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.364

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.