Literature DB >> 15191079

Biomechanical modelling of orthotic treatment of the scoliotic spine including a detailed representation of the brace-torso interface.

D Périé1, C E Aubin, M Lacroix, Y Lafon, H Labelle.   

Abstract

As part of the development of new modelling tools for the simulation and design of brace treatment of scoliosis, a finite element model of a brace and its interface with the torso was proposed. The model was adapted to represent one scoliotic adolescent girl treated with a Boston brace. The 3D geometry was acquired using multiview radiographs. The model included the osseo-ligamentous structures, thoracic and abdominal soft tissues, brace foam and shell, and brace-torso interface. The simulations consisted of brace opening to include the patient's trunk followed by brace closing. To validate the model, the resulting geometry was compared with the real in-brace geometry, and the resulting contact reaction forces at the brace-torso interface were compared with the equivalent forces calculated from pressure measurements made on the in-brace patient. Differences between coronal equivalent and reaction forces were less than 7N. However, sagittal reaction forces (47N) were computed on the abdomen, whereas negligible equivalent forces were measured. The simulated geometry presented partially reduced coronal Cobb angles (1-4 degrees), over-corrected sagittal Cobb angles and maximum deformation plane (5 degrees), completely corrected coronal shift, and sagittal shift and rib humps that were not corrected. This study demonstrated the feasibility of a new approach that represents the load transfer from the brace to the spine more realistically than does the direct application of forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15191079     DOI: 10.1007/bf02344709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  18 in total

1.  Electromyography of scoliotic patients treated with a brace.

Authors:  Daniel Odermatt; Pierre A Mathieu; Marie Beauséjour; Hubert Labelle; Carl Eric Aubin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Assessment of the 3-d reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images.

Authors:  S Delorme; Y Petit; J A de Guise; H Labelle; C E Aubin; J Dansereau
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  A three-dimensional motion model of loads on the lumbar spine: I. Model structure.

Authors:  W S Marras; C M Sommerich
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Optimization of skeletal configuration: studies of scoliosis correction biomechanics.

Authors:  G T Wynarsky; A B Schultz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Milwaukee brace correction of idiopathic scoliosis. A biomechanical analysis and a restrospective study.

Authors:  T P Andriacchi; A B Schultz; T B Belytschko; R Dewald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Finite element analysis in the human thorax.

Authors:  S H Sundaram; C C Feng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Optimization method for 3D bracing correction of scoliosis using a finite element model.

Authors:  D Gignac; C E Aubin; J Dansereau; H Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  [Biomechanical simulation of the effect of the Boston brace on a model of the scoliotic spine and thorax].

Authors:  C E Aubin; J Dansereau; H Labelle
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1993

9.  Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity.

Authors:  I A Stokes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of Cheneau-Toulouse-Munster brace in the treatment of scoliosis using optimisation approach and finite element method.

Authors:  D Périé; J Sales De Gauzy; M C Hobatho
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

View more
  10 in total

1.  Biomechanical modeling of brace treatment of scoliosis: effects of gravitational loads.

Authors:  Julien Clin; Carl-Éric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effectiveness of braces designed using computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and finite element simulation compared to CAD/CAM only for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  N Cobetto; C E Aubin; S Parent; J Clin; S Barchi; I Turgeon; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of the biomechanical 3D efficiency of different brace designs for the treatment of scoliosis using a finite element model.

Authors:  Julien Clin; Carl-Eric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Archana Sangole; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Sabrina Donzelli; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Dariusz Czaprowski; Sanja Schreiber; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Helmut Diers; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Andrea Lebel; Cindy Marti; Toru Maruyama; Joe O'Brien; Nigel Price; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; James Wynne; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-01-10

5.  2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Angelo G Aulisa; Lorenzo Aulisa; Alin B Circo; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Jacek Durmala; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama; Silvia Minozzi; Joseph P O'Brien; Dimitris Papadopoulos; Manuel Rigo; Charles H Rivard; Michele Romano; James H Wynne; Monica Villagrasa; Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-01-20

6.  Virtual prototyping of a brace design for the correction of scoliotic deformities.

Authors:  Julien Clin; Carl-Eric Aubin; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.079

7.  'SOSORT consensus paper on brace action: TLSO biomechanics of correction (investigating the rationale for force vector selection)'.

Authors:  M Rigo; S Negrini; H R Weiss; T B Grivas; T Maruyama; T Kotwicki
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-07-20

8.  3D correction of AIS in braces designed using CAD/CAM and FEM: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nikita Cobetto; Carl-Éric Aubin; Stefan Parent; Soraya Barchi; Isabelle Turgeon; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-07-23

9.  A mechanical analog thoracolumbar spine model for the evaluation of scoliosis bracing technology.

Authors:  Chloe L Chung; Derek M Kelly; Jack R Steele; Denis J DiAngelo
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2018-12-04

10.  Global postural re-education in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical modeling and analysis of curve reduction during active and assisted self-correction.

Authors:  Sarah Dupuis; Carole Fortin; Christiane Caouette; Isabelle Leclair; Carl-Éric Aubin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.