Literature DB >> 1860700

A three-dimensional motion model of loads on the lumbar spine: I. Model structure.

W S Marras1, C M Sommerich.   

Abstract

Traditionally most biomechanical models that are used to estimate the loading experienced by the spine during work focus on static, two-dimensional representations of the work. However, most work tasks impose loads on the lumbar spine under dynamic, three-dimensional conditions. The objective of this study was to describe the structure and logic of a model that is capable of producing estimates of spine loading under three-dimensional motion conditions. This model is intended for use primarily under laboratory conditions. The model was designed initially for workplace simulation in which the trunk is moving under symmetric and asymmetric constant velocity lifting conditions. Future embellishments may enable the model to be used under free dynamic conditions. The model predicts lumbar spine compression, shear, and torsional forces as well as trunk torque production continuously throughout the exertion. This information may be compared with spine tolerance limits so that the risk of causing a vertebral end-plate microfracture by workplace requirements could be determined.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1860700     DOI: 10.1177/001872089103300201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  8 in total

1.  An ultrasound investigation into the morphology of the human abdominal wall uncovers complex deformation patterns during contraction.

Authors:  Stephen H M Brown; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Mechanically corrected EMG for the continuous estimation of erector spinae muscle loading during repetitive lifting.

Authors:  J R Potvin; R W Norman; S M McGill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

3.  Musculoskeletal disorder risk during automotive assembly: current vs. seated.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; W Gary Allread; Gregory G Knapik; Riley E Splittstoesser
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Isovelocity investigation of the lengthening behaviour of the erector spinae muscles.

Authors:  C G Sutarno; S M McGill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

5.  Biomechanical modelling of orthotic treatment of the scoliotic spine including a detailed representation of the brace-torso interface.

Authors:  D Périé; C E Aubin; M Lacroix; Y Lafon; H Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Optimizing Calibration Procedure to Train a Regression-Based Prediction Model of Actively Generated Lumbar Muscle Moments for Exoskeleton Control.

Authors:  Ali Tabasi; Maria Lazzaroni; Niels P Brouwer; Idsart Kingma; Wietse van Dijk; Michiel P de Looze; Stefano Toxiri; Jesús Ortiz; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Study protocol title: a prospective cohort study of low back pain.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Kurt T Hegmann; J Steven Moore; Jay Kapellusch; Matthew S Thiese; Sruthi Boda; Parag Bhoyr; Donald Bloswick; Andrew Merryweather; Richard Sesek; Gwen Deckow-Schaefer; James Foster; Eric Wood; Xiaoming Sheng; Richard Holubkov
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Feasibility of a Biomechanically-Assistive Garment to Reduce Low Back Loading During Leaning and Lifting.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Aaron J Yang; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.538

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.