Literature DB >> 20094736

Comparison of the biomechanical 3D efficiency of different brace designs for the treatment of scoliosis using a finite element model.

Julien Clin1, Carl-Eric Aubin, Stefan Parent, Archana Sangole, Hubert Labelle.   

Abstract

The biomechanical influence of thoraco-lumbo-sacral bracing, a commonly employed treatment in scoliosis, is still not fully understood. The aim of this study was to compare the immediate corrections generated by different virtual braces using a patient-specific finite element model (FEM) and to analyze the most influential design factors. The 3D geometry of three patients presenting different types of curves was acquired with a multi-view X-ray technique and surface topography. A personalized FEM of the patients' trunk and a parametric model of a virtual custom-fit brace were then created. The installation of the braces on the patients was simulated. The influence of 15 design factors on the 3D correction generated by the brace was evaluated following a design of experiments simulation protocol allowing computing the main and two-way interaction effects of the design factors. A total of 12,288 different braces were tested. Results showed a great variability of the braces effectiveness. Of the 15 design factors investigated, according to the 2 modalities chosen for each one, the 5 most influential design factors were the position of the brace opening (posterior vs. anterior), the strap tension, the trochanter extension side, the lordosis design and the rigid shell shape. The position of the brace opening modified the correction mechanism. The trochanter extension position influenced the efficiency of the thoracic and lumbar pads by modifying their lever arm. Increasing the strap tension improved corrections of coronal curves. The lordosis design had an influence in the sagittal plane but not in the coronal plane. This study could help to better understand the brace biomechanics and to rationalize and optimize their design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20094736      PMCID: PMC2900013          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1268-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  31 in total

1.  Application of a lumbar brace for thoracic and double thoracic lumbar scoliosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Ben E E M J Veraart; Chris M T Plasmans
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Assessment of the 3-d reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images.

Authors:  S Delorme; Y Petit; J A de Guise; H Labelle; C E Aubin; J Dansereau
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  A new X-ray calibration/reconstruction system for 3D clinical assessment of spinal deformities.

Authors:  F Cheriet; L Remaki; C Bellefleur; A Koller; H Labelle; J Dansereau
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

4.  Accuracy assessment of human trunk surface 3D reconstructions from an optical digitising system.

Authors:  V Pazos; F Cheriet; L Song; H Labelle; J Dansereau
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Effect of bracing and other conservative interventions in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Marie-Louise B Lenssinck; Astrid C Frijlink; Marjolein Y Berger; Sita M A Bierman-Zeinstra; Karin Verkerk; Adrianne P Verhagen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-12

6.  Material properties of commonly-used interface materials and their static coefficients of friction with skin and socks.

Authors:  J E Sanders; J M Greve; S B Mitchell; S G Zachariah
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1998-06

7.  Milwaukee brace correction of idiopathic scoliosis. A biomechanical analysis and a restrospective study.

Authors:  T P Andriacchi; A B Schultz; T B Belytschko; R Dewald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  D E Rowe; S M Bernstein; M F Riddick; F Adler; J B Emans; D Gardner-Bonneau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Reliability of trunk shape measurements based on 3-D surface reconstructions.

Authors:  Valérie Pazos; Farida Cheriet; Jean Danserau; Janet Ronsky; Ronald F Zernicke; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, bracing, and the Hueter-Volkmann principle.

Authors:  Frank P Castro
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Computer algorithms and applications used to assist the evaluation and treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of published articles 2000-2009.

Authors:  Philippe Phan; Neila Mezghani; Carl-Éric Aubin; Jacques A de Guise; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Three dimensional analysis of brace biomechanical efficacy for patients with AIS.

Authors:  David E Lebel; Zaid Al-Aubaidi; Eyun-Jung Shin; Andrew Howard; Reinhard Zeller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Could clinical ultrasound improve the fitting of spinal orthosis for the patients with AIS?

Authors:  M Li; J Cheng; M Ying; B Ng; Y P Zheng; T P Lam; W Y Wong; M S Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Development of CAD/CAM Based Brace Models for the Treatment of Patients with Scoliosis-Classification Based Approach versus Finite Element Modelling.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Alexander Kleban
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

5.  The use of a photogrammetric method for the three-dimensional evaluation of spinal correction in scoliosis.

Authors:  Eric Berthonnaud; Patrice Papin; Julie Deceuninck; Radwan Hilmi; Jean Claude Bernard; Joannes Dimnet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Head to pelvis alignment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients both in and out of brace.

Authors:  Claudio Vergari; Isabelle Courtois; Eric Ebermeyer; Raphael Pietton; Houssam Bouloussa; Raphael Vialle; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Classification of three-dimensional thoracic deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Kadoury; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Prediction of brace effect in scoliotic patients: blinded evaluation of a novel brace simulator-an observational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Aurélien Courvoisier; Matthieu Nesme; Julien Gerbelot; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; François Faure
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Finite element analysis in brace treatment on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Wenqing Wei; Tianyuan Zhang; Zifang Huang; Junlin Yang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Review of current technologies and methods supplementing brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Andrew Chan; Edmond Lou; Doug Hill
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.