Literature DB >> 12195976

Biomechanical evaluation of Cheneau-Toulouse-Munster brace in the treatment of scoliosis using optimisation approach and finite element method.

D Périé1, J Sales De Gauzy, M C Hobatho.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the mechanisms of the Cheneau-Toulouse-Munster (CTM) brace in the correction of scoliotic curves, at night in the supine position. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Computer tomography (CT) acquisitions were performed in vivo on eight girls having an idiopathic scoliosis and being treated for the first time using a personalized CTM brace. Personalized 3D finite element models of the spine were developed for each patient, and an optimisation approach was used to quantify the forces generated by each brace on each scoliotic spine. A sensitivity study was undertaken to test the assumptions about intervertebral behaviour and load transmission from the brace to the spine. The computed CTM brace forces were 9-216N in the coronal plane and 2-72N in the sagittal plane. Personalized spinal stiffness properties should be included in spine models because, in this study, partial correction resulted from the application of higher estimated forces than for total correction. Partially reduced spines should be stiffer than totally reduced spines. The sensitivity study showed that the computed brace forces were proportional to the intervertebral Young's modulus and should be analysed as estimated data. Better knowledge of brace forces should be helpful in brace design to achieve the best correction of first scoliotic deformities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195976     DOI: 10.1007/bf02344211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  22 in total

1.  In vivo determination of contact areas and pressure of the femorotibial joint using non-linear finite element analysis.

Authors:  D. Périé; M.C. Hobatho
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Orthotic stabilization of thoracolumbar injuries. A biomechanical analysis of the Jewett hyperextension orthosis.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; S P Li; T Gavin; M Lorenz; K P Meade; M Zindrick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Three-dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; R A Brand; A A White
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Milwaukee brace correction of idiopathic scoliosis. A biomechanical analysis and a restrospective study.

Authors:  T P Andriacchi; A B Schultz; T B Belytschko; R Dewald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Finite element analysis in the human thorax.

Authors:  S H Sundaram; C C Feng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Optimization method for 3D bracing correction of scoliosis using a finite element model.

Authors:  D Gignac; C E Aubin; J Dansereau; H Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Long-term results of Boston brace treatment on vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  U Willers; H Normelli; S Aaro; O Svensson; R Hedlund
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Variability of strap tension in brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  C E Aubin; H Labelle; A Ruszkowski; Y Petit; D Gignac; J Joncas; J Dansereau
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with the Milwaukee brace.

Authors:  T Cochran; A Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The biomechanical effectiveness of the Boston brace in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  A P Chase; D L Bader; G R Houghton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Optimization design of thumbspica splint using finite element method.

Authors:  Tz-How Huang; Chi-Kung Feng; Yih-Wen Gung; Mei-Wun Tsai; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Evaluation of the efficiency of the Chêneau brace on scoliosis deformity : A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Karimi; Timon Rabczuk; Mahsa Kavyani
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Review of current technologies and methods supplementing brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Andrew Chan; Edmond Lou; Doug Hill
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Biomechanical modelling of orthotic treatment of the scoliotic spine including a detailed representation of the brace-torso interface.

Authors:  D Périé; C E Aubin; M Lacroix; Y Lafon; H Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  'SOSORT consensus paper on brace action: TLSO biomechanics of correction (investigating the rationale for force vector selection)'.

Authors:  M Rigo; S Negrini; H R Weiss; T B Grivas; T Maruyama; T Kotwicki
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-07-20

6.  Validation of a Patient-Specific Musculoskeletal Model for Lumbar Load Estimation Generated by an Automated Pipeline From Whole Body CT.

Authors:  Tanja Lerchl; Malek El Husseini; Amirhossein Bayat; Anjany Sekuboyina; Luis Hermann; Kati Nispel; Thomas Baum; Maximilian T Löffler; Veit Senner; Jan S Kirschke
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-11

Review 7.  Scoliosis conservative treatment: A review of literature.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Karimi; Timon Rabczuk
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.