Literature DB >> 15188776

[The infected hip prosthesis].

S Ruchholtz1, G Täger, D Nast-Kolb.   

Abstract

Therapy of infected hip prosthesis should always be based on a structured treatment concept. When short-termed early infection is present or impending, with meticulous debridement of the soft tissue surroundings, the implant may be left in place. Chronic infection (>30 days) should lead to complete removal of implant and cement. A one-staged revision of the implant may be considered for patients without additional chronic disease, good vascularization of soft tissue and bones and bacteria susceptible to antibiotics. In most cases though two-staged revision is indicated. The interval between implant removal and re-implantation ranges between one and four months. Re-implantation should only be performed when laboratory parameters are normalized and the local wound site has turned to an unsuspicious condition. By insertion of a cement spacer during the interval period soft tissue shortening and local scar formation can be prevented. Parenteral antibiotics should be applied for four to six weeks. In patients with reduced general health state and extremely severe infection permanent resection of the hip or limp ablation may be indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15188776     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-004-0751-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  20 in total

1.  [Treatment of infection by vacuum sealing].

Authors:  W Fleischmann; E Lang; M Russ
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Detection of biomaterial-associated infections in orthopaedic joint implants.

Authors:  Daniëlle Neut; Jim R van Horn; Theo G van Kooten; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Infection after total hip arthroplasty. Past, present, and future.

Authors:  K L Garvin; A D Hanssen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  A cement spacer for two-stage revision of infected implants of the hip joint.

Authors:  M Leunig; E Chosa; M Speck; R Ganz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  The diagnosis of large joint sepsis.

Authors:  B L Atkins; I C Bowler
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 6.  Total hip and total knee replacement (2)

Authors:  W H Harris; C B Sledge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Cost analysis of revision total hip arthroplasty. A 5-year followup study.

Authors:  R L Barrack; J Sawhney; J Hsu; R H Cofield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The Girdlestone pseudarthrosis in the treatment of infected hip replacements.

Authors:  J Castellanos; X Flores; M Llusà; C Chiriboga; A Navarro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Girdlestone arthroplasty for loosening of the total hip prosthesis: evaluation and results.

Authors:  A Scalvi; A Campacci; M Marcer; M Cassini; C Guerra; M Ferraresi; M R Ghasemi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

10.  Treatment outcome of two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for infected hip arthroplasty using antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer.

Authors:  Naonobu Takahira; Moritoshi Itoman; Kei Higashi; Katsufumi Uchiyama; Motoi Miyabe; Kouji Naruse
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.601

View more
  12 in total

1.  [Diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic infections].

Authors:  M Lenz; G O Hofmann; T Mückley
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Hard implant coatings with antimicrobial properties.

Authors:  Claus Moseke; Uwe Gbureck; Patrick Elter; Peter Drechsler; Andreas Zoll; Roger Thull; Andrea Ewald
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  [Arthrodesis after total knee arthroplasty considering septic loosening as an example].

Authors:  T von Stein; H Gollwitzer; C Kruis; V Bühren
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  B Lehner; D Witte; A J Suda; S Weiss
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  [Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses].

Authors:  M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  [Diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infections].

Authors:  C M Lüdemann; N Schütze; M Rudert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  [Preservation of hip prosthesis with local surgical revision and creation of a fistula persistens : an option for palliative treatment of periprosthetic infection in old, polymorbid patients?].

Authors:  A H Tiemann; L Homagk; M Diefenbeck; T Mückley; G O Hofmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  [Two-stage procedure to exchange septic total hip arthroplasties with late periprosthetic infection. Early results after implantation of a reverse modular hybrid endoprosthesis].

Authors:  G Walter; M Bühler; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeppe Lange; Anders Troelsen; Reimar W Thomsen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Synthesis of Silver- and Strontium-Substituted Hydroxyapatite with Combined Osteogenic and Antibacterial Activities.

Authors:  Yunfei Li; Wenying Wang; Jing Han; Zirui Li; Qiuxiang Wang; Xue Lin; Kun Ge; Guoqiang Zhou
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.