Literature DB >> 12897618

Detection of biomaterial-associated infections in orthopaedic joint implants.

Daniëlle Neut1, Jim R van Horn, Theo G van Kooten, Henny C van der Mei, Henk J Busscher.   

Abstract

Biomaterial-associated infection of orthopaedic joint replacements is the second most common cause of implant failure. Yet, the microbiologic detection rate of infection is relatively low, probably because routine hospital cultures are made only of swabs or small pieces of excised tissue and not of the surfaces of potentially infected implants. Joint replacements from patients in whom infection was suspected, after clinical, radiologic, and biochemical examinations, were used in this study. The aim of the current study was to compare the detection rate of infection in total joint replacements based on cultures of the excised tissue and scrapings from the biomaterial surface. Joint prostheses were retrieved from 22 patients requiring orthopaedic revision surgery because of suspected infection of their prostheses. Routine hospital culturing of tissue only showed bacterial growth in nine patients (41%). However, after prolonged culturing, bacterial growth was observed in 14 patients (64%), whereas extensive culturing of scrapings from the biomaterial surface indicated bacterial growth in 19 of the 22 patients (86%). In addition, confocal laser scanning microscopy enabled observation of biofilm bacteria on the surfaces of the explanted prostheses. Diagnosis in orthopaedic revision surgery should consider using a microbial or microscopic analysis of the surface of an explanted prosthesis, where the biofilm mode of growth firmly anchors and protects the infecting organisms. Improved detection of infection by analysis of the implant surface is expected to yield ameliorated therapy and a reduced need for revision surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12897618     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000073345.50837.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  52 in total

1.  [The infected hip prosthesis].

Authors:  S Ruchholtz; G Täger; D Nast-Kolb
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Infections Associated with Prosthetic Knee and Prosthetic Hip.

Authors:  Joseph R Lentino
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.

Authors:  Joachim Singer; Andreas Merz; Lars Frommelt; Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Logistic requirements and biopsy of periprosthetic infections: what should be taken into consideration?].

Authors:  B Fink; P Schäfer; L Frommelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic infections].

Authors:  M Lenz; G O Hofmann; T Mückley
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Bacterial pathogen-associated molecular patterns stimulate biological activity of orthopaedic wear particles by activating cognate Toll-like receptors.

Authors:  Edward M Greenfield; Michelle A Beidelschies; Joscelyn M Tatro; Victor M Goldberg; Amy G Hise
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  [Allergic reactions as differential diagnosis for periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  H Meyer; A Krüger; A Roessner; C H Lohmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  [Improving microbiological diagnostics in septic orthopaedic surgery. Comparative study of patients receiving systemic antibiotic therapy].

Authors:  B G Ochs; M Kommerell; H K Geiss; H G Simank
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Ultrasonically controlled release of ciprofloxacin from self-assembled coatings on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm prevention.

Authors:  P Norris; M Noble; I Francolini; A M Vinogradov; P S Stewart; B D Ratner; J W Costerton; P Stoodley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  [C-reactive protein. An independent risk factor for the development of infection after primary arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Pfitzner; D Krocker; C Perka; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.