Literature DB >> 19657619

[Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection].

B Lehner1, D Witte, A J Suda, S Weiss.   

Abstract

Periprosthetic infection remains a major complication in arthroplasty; increasing numbers of primary and revision arthroplasties are being followed by increasing numbers of periprosthetic infections. In cases of possible infection, the surgeon must have a treatment concept that can be individually adjusted. Diagnosis is a challenge and should include a variety of investigations. In early and secondary infections, component retention can be successful. Surgical debridement is the key to success. All late and chronic infections should be treated by explantation of all components because of infection with biofilm-producing microbes. The individual patient's situation and the surgeon's experience should determine whether to choose direct single-stage or two-stage revision. New diagnostic and therapeutic procedures can improve outcomes but cannot replace the need for prophylactic efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19657619     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1434-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  28 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  [The infected implant].

Authors:  J Wodtke; J F Löhr
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Improving the diagnosis of septic arthritis by use of a pediatric blood culture system].

Authors:  S Weiss; H Geiss; M Kommerell; H-G Simank; L Bernd; P Henle
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration.

Authors:  A G Gristina
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  [Early results of one-stage septic revision arthroplasties with antibiotic-laden cement. A clinical and statistical analysis].

Authors:  D Sofer; B Regenbrecht; J Pfeil
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and prosthesis retention.

Authors:  C M Brandt; W W Sistrunk; M C Duffy; A D Hanssen; J M Steckelberg; D M Ilstrup; D R Osmon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Infection following hip replacement: solution options.

Authors:  Fares S Haddad; Anna Bridgens
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study.

Authors:  E F Berbari; A D Hanssen; M C Duffy; J M Steckelberg; D M Ilstrup; W S Harmsen; D R Osmon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy.

Authors:  Peter Schäfer; Bernd Fink; Dieter Sandow; Andreas Margull; Irina Berger; Lars Frommelt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Hand-made articulating spacers in two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty: good outcome in 30 patients.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Antonio Ríos-Luna; Javier Pereiro; Homid Fahandez-Saddi; Angel Villamor
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  11 in total

1.  [Hip joint infections - Results of a questionnaire among 28 university orthopedic departments].

Authors:  K Anagnostakos; D Kohn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Standards of microbiological diagnostics of spondylodiscitis].

Authors:  B Lehner; M Akbar; C Rehnitz; G W Omlor; U Dapunt; I Burckhardt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses].

Authors:  M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infections].

Authors:  C M Lüdemann; N Schütze; M Rudert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 5.  Management of the infected shoulder prosthesis: a retrospective analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Patrick Weber; Sandra Utzschneider; Patrick Sadoghi; Hans-Joachim Andress; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  First experiences with negative pressure wound therapy and instillation in the treatment of infected orthopaedic implants: a clinical observational study.

Authors:  Burkhard Lehner; Wim Fleischmann; Rolf Becker; Gerrolt N Jukema
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  [Bacterial infections of the rheumatoid foot].

Authors:  H-D Carl; K Gelse; B Swoboda
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].

Authors:  B S Craiovan; J Grifka; A Keshmiri; B Moser; M Wörner; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 9.  [Pathophysiology of implant-associated infections: From biofilm to osteolysis and septic loosening].

Authors:  C Wagner; G M Hänsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeppe Lange; Anders Troelsen; Reimar W Thomsen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.