Literature DB >> 9728312

The Girdlestone pseudarthrosis in the treatment of infected hip replacements.

J Castellanos1, X Flores, M Llusà, C Chiriboga, A Navarro.   

Abstract

The results of 78 resections of the head and neck of the femur (Girdlestone pseudarthrosis) in patients with infected hip replacements were studied. The mean follow-up was 5 years. At the time of the resection, gram-positive organisms were found in 53% of the cases, gram-negative in 33%, and in 12% there were mixed flora. The Girdlestone pseudarthrosis controlled the infection in 86% and achieved satisfactory relief of pain in 83%. The mean shortening of the limb was 4.1 cm and every patient needed some type of external walking aid. We found no correlation between the type of organisms and the persistence of infection, nor between shortening and the functional results. The Girdlestone pseudarthrosis is an acceptable method of controlling infection and relieving pain after infection of a total hip replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9728312      PMCID: PMC3619587          DOI: 10.1007/s002640050236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  14 in total

1.  [The infected hip prosthesis].

Authors:  S Ruchholtz; G Täger; D Nast-Kolb
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Ryan S Charette; Christopher M Melnic
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

3.  Surgical therapy of hip-joint empyema. Is the Girdlestone arthroplasty still up to date?

Authors:  Ralf Oheim; Justus Gille; Rita Schoop; Sonja Mägerlein; Cornelius H Grimme; Christian Jürgens; Ulf-Joachim Gerlach
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Girdlestone resection arthroplasty following failed surgical procedures.

Authors:  H Sharma; J De Leeuw; D I Rowley
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Risk factors for failed cleansing following periprosthetic delayed hip prosthesis infection].

Authors:  U Spiegl; R Pätzold; J Friederichs; M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Two stage revision hip arthroplasty in periprosthetic joint infection. Comparison study: with or without the use of a spacer.

Authors:  Dariusz Marczak; Marek Synder; Marcin Sibiński; Michał Polguj; Julian Dudka; Jacek Kowalczewski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Aaron J Tande; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging findings in hematogenous osteomyelitis of the hip in adults.

Authors:  Charalampos G Zalavras; Nick Rigopoulos; John Lee; Thomas Learch; Michael J Patzakis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Outcome of total hip arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for failed infected internal fixation of hip fractures.

Authors:  Shubhranshu S Mohanty; Mandar V Agashe; Binoti A Sheth; Kumar K Dash
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Analysis of perioperative outcomes in hip resection arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alireza K Nazemi; Alexander Upfill-Brown; Armin Arshi; Troy Sekimura; Erik N Zeegen; Edward J McPherson; Alexandra I Stavrakis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.