Literature DB >> 15185117

Responsiveness to sucrose and habituation of the proboscis extension response in honey bees.

Ricarda Scheiner1.   

Abstract

In honey bees, complex behaviours such as associative learning correlate with responsiveness to sucrose. In these behaviours, the subjective evaluation of a sucrose stimulus influences the behavioural performance. Habituation is a well-known form of non-associative learning. In bees, the proboscis extension response can be habituated by repeatedly stimulating the antennae with a low sucrose concentration. A high sucrose concentration can dishabituate the response. This study tests whether habituation correlates with responsiveness to sucrose in bees of different behavioural states and in bees which are habituated with different sucrose concentrations. Habituation and dishabituation in newly emerged bees, 5-day-old bees and foragers strongly correlated with responsiveness to sucrose. Bees with high responsiveness to sucrose displayed a lower degree of habituation and showed greater dishabituation than bees with low responsiveness. The degree of habituation and dishabituation also depended on the concentration of the habituation stimulus. These experiments demonstrate for the first time in a non-associative learning paradigm that the subjective strength of a sucrose stimulus determines the behavioural performance. Non-associative learning shares this property with associative learning, which suggests that the two processes might rely on similar neural mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15185117     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-004-0531-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  16 in total

Review 1.  Levels of behavioral organization and the evolution of division of labor.

Authors:  Robert E Page; Joachim Erber
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2002-03

2.  Tactile learning and the individual evaluation of the reward in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R Scheiner; J Erber; R E Page
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R E Page; J Erber; M K Fondrk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Is there a cell-biological alphabet for simple forms of learning?

Authors:  R D Hawkins; E R Kandel
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Long-term habituation of an appetitive reflex in the honeybee.

Authors:  G Bicker; I Hähnlein
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1994-12-30       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  The effects of genotype, foraging role, and sucrose responsiveness on the tactile learning performance of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R Scheiner; R E Page; J Erber
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Genetic dissection of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging behavior.

Authors:  R E Page; M K Fondrk; G J Hunt; E Guzmán-Novoa; M A Humphries; K Nguyen; A S Greene
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Imidacloprid-induced facilitation of the proboscis extension reflex habituation in the honeybee.

Authors:  M Lambin; C Armengaud; S Raymond; M Gauthier
Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.698

9.  The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  T Pankiw; R E Page
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Responsiveness to sucrose affects tactile and olfactory learning in preforaging honey bees of two genetic strains.

Authors:  R Scheiner; R E Page; J Erber
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-04-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  23 in total

1.  Virus infection causes specific learning deficits in honeybee foragers.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Uli Mueller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetics of reproduction and regulation of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) social behavior.

Authors:  Robert E Page; Olav Rueppell; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Habituation underpins preference for mates with novel phenotypes in the guppy.

Authors:  M J Daniel; L Koffinas; K A Hughes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The parasitic mite Varroa destructor affects non-associative learning in honey bee foragers, Apis mellifera L.

Authors:  Jasna Kralj; Axel Brockmann; Stefan Fuchs; Jürgen Tautz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  8. The development and evolution of division of labor and foraging specialization in a social insect (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Robert E Page; Ricarda Scheiner; Joachim Erber; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Sucrose acceptance, discrimination and proboscis responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  Samir Mujagic; Joachim Erber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Down-regulation of honey bee IRS gene biases behavior toward food rich in protein.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Navdeep S Mutti; Kate E Ihle; Adam Siegel; Adam G Dolezal; Osman Kaftanoglu; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Sucrose acceptance and different forms of associative learning of the honey bee (apis mellifera L.) in the field and laboratory.

Authors:  Samir Mujagic; Jana Sarkander; Barbara Erber; Joachim Erber
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Downregulation of vitellogenin gene activity increases the gustatory responsiveness of honey bee workers (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Gro V Amdam; Kari Norberg; Robert E Page; Joachim Erber; Ricarda Scheiner
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Aminergic control and modulation of honeybee behaviour.

Authors:  R Scheiner; A Baumann; W Blenau
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.