Literature DB >> 11502146

The effects of genotype, foraging role, and sucrose responsiveness on the tactile learning performance of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

R Scheiner1, R E Page, J Erber.   

Abstract

We analyzed sucrose responsiveness and associative tactile learning in two genetic strains of honey bees under laboratory conditions. These strains differ in their foraging behavior. Bees of the "high" strain preferentially collect pollen. "Low"-strain bees mainly forage for nectar. Responsiveness to different sucrose concentrations and tactile learning were examined using the proboscis extension reflex. Acquisition, extinction of conditioned responses, and responses to an alternative tactile stimulus were tested. High-strain bees are more responsive to sucrose than low-strain bees. Regardless of genotype, pollen foragers are more responsive to sucrose than nectar foragers. In bees of both strains we find the same relationship between responsiveness to sucrose and acquisition. Bees responding to low sucrose concentrations show more often the conditioned response during acquisition than those responding only to higher sucrose concentrations. Extinction of conditioned responses depends on the response probability during acquisition. Discrimination between the two tactile stimuli is affected by genotype but not by responsiveness to sucrose. High-strain bees discriminate better than low-strain bees. Our experiments thus establish links between division of labor, responsiveness to sucrose, and associative learning in honey bees. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11502146     DOI: 10.1006/nlme.2000.3996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  66 in total

1.  Immune response inhibits associative learning in insects.

Authors:  Eamonn B Mallon; Axel Brockmann; Paul Schmid-Hempel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The making of a social insect: developmental architectures of social design.

Authors:  Robert E Page; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Sensory responsiveness and the effects of equal subjective rewards on tactile learning and memory of honeybees.

Authors:  Ricarda Scheiner; Anthea Kuritz-Kaiser; Randolf Menzel; Joachim Erber
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees.

Authors:  Nigel E Raine; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genetic architecture of ovary size and asymmetry in European honeybee workers.

Authors:  O Rueppell; J D Metheny; T Linksvayer; M K Fondrk; R E Page; G V Amdam
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Sucrose acceptance, discrimination and proboscis responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  Samir Mujagic; Joachim Erber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Learning at old age: a study on winter bees.

Authors:  Andreas Behrends; Ricarda Scheiner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Down-regulation of honey bee IRS gene biases behavior toward food rich in protein.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Navdeep S Mutti; Kate E Ihle; Adam Siegel; Adam G Dolezal; Osman Kaftanoglu; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Reappraising social insect behavior through aversive responsiveness and learning.

Authors:  Edith Roussel; Julie Carcaud; Jean-Christophe Sandoz; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effects of young brood on the foraging behavior of two strains of honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Jennifer M Tsuruda; Robert E Page
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.