Literature DB >> 10488557

The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

T Pankiw1, R E Page.   

Abstract

Bees derived from artificially selected high- and low-pollen-hoarding strains were tested for their proboscis extension reflex response to water and varying sucrose concentrations. High-strain bees had a lower response threshold to sucrose than low-strain bees among pre-foragers, foragers, queens and drones. Pre-foraging low-strain workers showed ontogenetic changes in their response threshold to sucrose which was inversely related to age. High-strain foragers were more likely to return with loads of water compared to low-strain foragers. Whereas low-strain foragers were more likely to return with loads of nectar. Low-strain nectar foragers collected nectar with significantly higher sucrose concentrations than did the high-strain nectar foragers. Alternatively, low-strain foragers were more likely to return empty compared to high-strain foragers. These studies demonstrate how a genotypically varied sensory-physiological process, the perception of sucrose, are associated with a division of labor for foraging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10488557     DOI: 10.1007/s003590050379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  61 in total

Review 1.  The making of a social insect: developmental architectures of social design.

Authors:  Robert E Page; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Sensory responsiveness and the effects of equal subjective rewards on tactile learning and memory of honeybees.

Authors:  Ricarda Scheiner; Anthea Kuritz-Kaiser; Randolf Menzel; Joachim Erber
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Odor discrimination in classical conditioning of proboscis extension in two stingless bee species in comparison to Africanized honeybees.

Authors:  S I Mc Cabe; K Hartfelder; W C Santana; W M Farina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Regulation of behavioral maturation by a primer pheromone produced by adult worker honey bees.

Authors:  Isabelle Leoncini; Yves Le Conte; Guy Costagliola; Erika Plettner; Amy L Toth; Mianwei Wang; Zachary Huang; Jean-Marc Bécard; Didier Crauser; Keith N Slessor; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sucrose acceptance, discrimination and proboscis responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  Samir Mujagic; Joachim Erber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Complex pleiotropy characterizes the pollen hoarding syndrome in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Robert E Page; M Kim Fondrk; Olav Rueppell
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Down-regulation of honey bee IRS gene biases behavior toward food rich in protein.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Navdeep S Mutti; Kate E Ihle; Adam Siegel; Adam G Dolezal; Osman Kaftanoglu; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  The influence of gustatory and olfactory experiences on responsiveness to reward in the honeybee.

Authors:  Gabriela P Ramírez; Andrés S Martínez; Vanesa M Fernández; Gonzalo Corti Bielsa; Walter M Farina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reappraising social insect behavior through aversive responsiveness and learning.

Authors:  Edith Roussel; Julie Carcaud; Jean-Christophe Sandoz; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effects of young brood on the foraging behavior of two strains of honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Jennifer M Tsuruda; Robert E Page
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.