Literature DB >> 12046634

Levels of behavioral organization and the evolution of division of labor.

Robert E Page1, Joachim Erber.   

Abstract

The major features of insect societies that fascinate biologists are the self-sacrificing altruism expressed by colony members, the complex division of labor, and the tremendous plasticity demonstrated in the face of changing environments. The social behavior of insects is a result of complex interactions at different levels of biological organization. Genes give rise to proteins and peptides that build the nervous and muscular systems, regulate their own synthesis, interact with each other, and affect the behavior of individuals. Social behavior emerges from the complex interactions of individuals that are themselves far removed from the direct effects of the genes. In order to understand how social organization evolves, we must understand the mechanisms that link the different levels of organization. In this review, we discuss how behavior is influenced by genes and the neural system and how social behavior emerges from the behavioral activities of individuals. We show how different levels of organization share common features and are linked through common mechanisms. We focus on the behavior of the honey bee, the best studied of all social insects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12046634     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-002-0299-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  57 in total

1.  Fitness effects of group merging in a social insect.

Authors:  James T Costa; Kenneth G Ross
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Collective decision through self-assembling.

Authors:  Arnaud Lioni; Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-04-08

3.  The 'division of physiological labour': the birth, life and death of a concept.

Authors:  Emmanuel D'Hombres
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.326

4.  Complex social behaviour derived from maternal reproductive traits.

Authors:  Gro V Amdam; Angela Csondes; M Kim Fondrk; Robert E Page
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Worker caste determination in the army ant Eciton burchellii.

Authors:  Rodolfo Jaffé; Daniel J C Kronauer; F Bernhard Kraus; Jacobus J Boomsma; Robin F A Moritz
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Octopamine influences honey bee foraging preference.

Authors:  Tugrul Giray; Alberto Galindo-Cardona; Devrim Oskay
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  Worker honey bee pheromone regulation of foraging ontogeny.

Authors:  Tanya Pankiw
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-02-27

8.  Sucrose acceptance, discrimination and proboscis responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  Samir Mujagic; Joachim Erber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Complex pleiotropy characterizes the pollen hoarding syndrome in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Robert E Page; M Kim Fondrk; Olav Rueppell
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Genomic analysis in the sting-2 quantitative trait locus for defensive behavior in the honey bee, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Neil F Lobo; Lucas Q Ton; Catherine A Hill; Christine Emore; Jeanne Romero-Severson; Greg J Hunt; Frank H Collins
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.