Literature DB >> 11173086

Responsiveness to sucrose affects tactile and olfactory learning in preforaging honey bees of two genetic strains.

R Scheiner1, R E Page, J Erber.   

Abstract

Using sucrose solution as reward, we conditioned preforaging honey bees of two genetic strains to tactile stimuli or to odours. Acquisition, extinction of conditioned responses and discrimination between the conditioned stimuli and alternative tactile or olfactory stimuli were measured. Bees of the two genetic strains were selected for their foraging behaviour. In addition, they differ in their responsiveness to sucrose. To analyse the effects of sucrose perception on learning parameters independent of foraging behaviour, we conditioned preforaging bees of the two strains and compared their performance in tactile and olfactory learning paradigms. In both strains, acquisition in tactile and olfactory conditioning is determined by responsiveness to sucrose. There is no genetic effect on the relationship between responsiveness to sucrose and acquisition. Bees responding to low sucrose concentrations perform better than ones that only respond to higher concentrations. Extinction of conditioned responses correlates with acquisition. Responses to alternative stimuli are independent of responsiveness to sucrose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11173086     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00359-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  60 in total

1.  Immune response inhibits associative learning in insects.

Authors:  Eamonn B Mallon; Axel Brockmann; Paul Schmid-Hempel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The making of a social insect: developmental architectures of social design.

Authors:  Robert E Page; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Sensory responsiveness and the effects of equal subjective rewards on tactile learning and memory of honeybees.

Authors:  Ricarda Scheiner; Anthea Kuritz-Kaiser; Randolf Menzel; Joachim Erber
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees.

Authors:  Nigel E Raine; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sucrose acceptance, discrimination and proboscis responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  Samir Mujagic; Joachim Erber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Complex pleiotropy characterizes the pollen hoarding syndrome in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Robert E Page; M Kim Fondrk; Olav Rueppell
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Learning at old age: a study on winter bees.

Authors:  Andreas Behrends; Ricarda Scheiner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Down-regulation of honey bee IRS gene biases behavior toward food rich in protein.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Navdeep S Mutti; Kate E Ihle; Adam Siegel; Adam G Dolezal; Osman Kaftanoglu; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Reappraising social insect behavior through aversive responsiveness and learning.

Authors:  Edith Roussel; Julie Carcaud; Jean-Christophe Sandoz; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effects of young brood on the foraging behavior of two strains of honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Jennifer M Tsuruda; Robert E Page
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.