Literature DB >> 15185066

Risk factors for hip fracture in women with high BMD: EPIDOS study.

J A Robbins1, A M Schott, P Garnero, P D Delmas, D Hans, P J Meunier.   

Abstract

Hip fractures are common among older women. At the present time, major efforts are being made to identify women with low bone mineral density (BMD). However, more than half of hip fractures occur in women who would not classically be considered osteoporotic by BMD. This study aimed to identify factors associated with hip fracture in women with high BMDs. A total of 7598 French women aged over 74 participated in the EPIDOS study and had BMD measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Analysis was carried out comparing women with and without hip fractures over more than 3 years of follow-up. The participants were divided into three groups based on femoral neck BMD, so as to have equal numbers in each group (cut-off points=0.601 g/cm(2), and 0.683 g/cm(2)). Multiple risk factors thought to be associated with hip fracture were tested in the high and low BMD groups to search for those whose effect was stronger in the high BMD group. Age adjusted Cox regression was used. Results for continuous variables are reported per standard deviation change. Positive interaction between higher BMD, hip fracture and the following factors were found: age (P<0.01), ultrasound attenuation (P<0.05), urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD) (P<0.05), left quadriceps strength (P<0.05) and right and left foot coordination (P<0.05). The following factors had a larger hazards ratio in those in the upper third of BMD than the low and were statistically significant: femoral neck BMD, nulliparity, age, ultrasound attenuation and speed, prior fracture, urinary deoxypyridinoline, left grip strength and foot coordination. Multiple factors appear to be more strongly associated with hip fractures in women with high BMD than low. They appear to cluster as factors that may relate to bone turnover and architecture and others which are more subtle measures of left-sided coordination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15185066     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1661-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

1.  Bone density of the spine and femur in adult white females.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H Barden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  R Eastell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The risk of hip fracture among noninstitutionalized older adults.

Authors:  F D Wolinsky; J F Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-07

4.  An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D M Black; M Steinbuch; L Palermo; P Dargent-Molina; R Lindsay; M S Hoseyni; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Do markers of bone resorption add to bone mineral density and ultrasonographic heel measurement for the prediction of hip fracture in elderly women? The EPIDOS prospective study.

Authors:  P Garnero; P Dargent-Molina; D Hans; A M Schott; G Bréart; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; John Robbins; Zhao Chen; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca D Jackson; Andrea Z LaCroix; Meryl LeBoff; Cora E Lewis; Joan McGowan; Joan Neuner; Mary Pettinger; Marcia L Stefanick; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Nulliparity and fracture risk in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Teresa A Hillier; Joanne H Rizzo; Kathryn L Pedula; Katie L Stone; Jane A Cauley; Doug C Bauer; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate.

Authors:  R Eastell; I Barton; R A Hannon; A Chines; P Garnero; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18
View more
  31 in total

1.  A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Zvi Schechner; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Age-related trends in hip geometry in Sri Lankan women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sarath Lekamwasam; Janaka Lenora
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Baboons as a model to study genetics and epigenetics of human disease.

Authors:  Laura A Cox; Anthony G Comuzzie; Lorena M Havill; Genesio M Karere; Kimberly D Spradling; Michael C Mahaney; Peter W Nathanielsz; Daniel P Nicolella; Robert E Shade; Saroja Voruganti; John L VandeBerg
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2013

4.  Can Hip Fracture Prediction in Women be Estimated beyond Bone Mineral Density Measurement Alone?

Authors:  Piet Geusens; Tineke van Geel; Joop van den Bergh
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  Potential for bone turnover markers to cost-effectively identify and select post-menopausal osteopenic women at high risk of fracture for bisphosphonate therapy.

Authors:  J T Schousboe; D C Bauer; J A Nyman; R L Kane; L J Melton; K E Ensrud
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Bone quality and bone strength: benefits of the bone-forming approach.

Authors:  Giovanni Iolascon; Laura Frizzi; Gioconda Di Pietro; Annarita Capaldo; Fabrizio Luciano; Francesca Gimigliano
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-01

7.  Heritability of lumbar trabecular bone mechanical properties in baboons.

Authors:  L M Havill; M R Allen; T L Bredbenner; D B Burr; D P Nicolella; C H Turner; D M Warren; M C Mahaney
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  BMD T-score discriminates trochanteric fractures from unfractured controls, whereas geometry discriminates cervical fracture cases from unfractured controls of similar BMD.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; J Partanen; P Jalovaara; T Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Use of DXA-based structural engineering models of the proximal femur to discriminate hip fracture.

Authors:  Lang Yang; Nicola Peel; Jackie A Clowes; Eugene V McCloskey; Richard Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; T Jämsä; E-M Lochmüller; V Kuhn; M T Nieminen; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.