Literature DB >> 12817758

Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate.

R Eastell1, I Barton, R A Hannon, A Chines, P Garnero, P D Delmas.   

Abstract

Changes in the level of biochemical markers of bone resorption with risedronate treatment for osteoporosis were examined as a surrogate for the decrease in fracture risk. Greater decreases in bone resorption markers were associated with greater decreases in vertebral (and nonvertebral) fractures. Antifracture efficacy of antiresorptive therapies is only partially explained by increases in bone mineral density. Early decreases in bone resorption may also play a role. We tested this hypothesis by measuring two bone resorption markers, the C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and the N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), in osteoporotic patients in risedronate vertebral fracture trials. We studied 693 women with at least one vertebral deformity (mean age, 69 +/- 7 years) who received calcium (and vitamin D if required) and placebo or risedronate 5 mg daily for 3 years. The reductions in urinary CTX (median, 60%) and NTX (51%) at 3-6 months with risedronate therapy were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with the reduction in vertebral fracture risk (75% over 1 year and 50% over 3 years). The changes in both CTX and NTX accounted for approximately one-half (CTX, 55%; NTX, 49%) of risedronate's effect in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures in the first year and approximately two-thirds (CTX, 67%; NTX, 66%) over 3 years compared with placebo. The changes in CTX and NTX accounted for 77% and 54%, respectively, of risedronate's effect in reducing the risk of nonvertebral fractures over 3 years compared with placebo. The relationships between vertebral fracture risk and changes from baseline in CTX and NTX were not linear (p < 0.05). There was little further improvement in fracture benefit below a decrease of 55-60% for CTX and 35-40% for NTX. The decrease in bone resorption in patients taking risedronate accounts for a large proportion of the reduction in fracture risk. There may be a level of bone resorption reduction below which there is no further fracture benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12817758     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.6.1051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  138 in total

1.  Urinary pentosidine and plasma homocysteine levels at baseline predict future fractures in osteoporosis patients under bisphosphonate treatment.

Authors:  Masataka Shiraki; Tatsuhiko Kuroda; Yumiko Shiraki; Shiro Tanaka; Tsuyoshi Higuchi; Mitsuru Saito
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Bone turnover markers: use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kim Naylor; Richard Eastell
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Successes achieved and challenges ahead in translating biomarkers into clinical applications.

Authors:  Greg Tesch; Shashi Amur; John T Schousboe; Jeffrey N Siegel; Lawrence J Lesko; Jane P F Bai
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Zvi Schechner; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  Clinical use of bone turnover markers to monitor pharmacologic fracture prevention therapy.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Douglas C Bauer
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 7.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical development of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease: potential uses and pitfalls.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  The elusive concept of bone quality.

Authors:  Robert R Recker; M Janet Barger-Lux
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  Bone remodeling markers: assessment of fracture risk and fracture risk reduction.

Authors:  Aubrey Blumsohn
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Prediction of changes in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women treated with once-weekly bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie; Kenneth Saag; Anthony Sebba; Anne E de Papp; Erluo Chen; Elizabeth Rosenberg; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.