Literature DB >> 30126322

Tournament leave-pair-out cross-validation for receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Ileana Montoya Perez1,2, Antti Airola1, Peter J Boström2, Ivan Jambor3,4, Tapio Pahikkala1.   

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic analysis is widely used for evaluating diagnostic systems. Recent studies have shown that estimating an area under receiver operating characteristic curve with standard cross-validation methods suffers from a large bias. The leave-pair-out cross-validation has been shown to correct this bias. However, while leave-pair-out produces an almost unbiased estimate of area under receiver operating characteristic curve, it does not provide a ranking of the data needed for plotting and analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curve. In this study, we propose a new method called tournament leave-pair-out cross-validation. This method extends leave-pair-out by creating a tournament from pair comparisons to produce a ranking for the data. Tournament leave-pair-out preserves the advantage of leave-pair-out for estimating area under receiver operating characteristic curve, while it also allows performing receiver operating characteristic analyses. We have shown using both synthetic and real-world data that tournament leave-pair-out is as reliable as leave-pair-out for area under receiver operating characteristic curve estimation and confirmed the bias in leave-one-out cross-validation on low-dimensional data. As a case study on receiver operating characteristic analysis, we also evaluate how reliably sensitivity and specificity can be estimated from tournament leave-pair-out receiver operating characteristic curves.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Diagnostic systems; area under curve; cross-validation; receiver operating characteristic analysis; tournament

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30126322      PMCID: PMC6745617          DOI: 10.1177/0962280218795190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  22 in total

1.  The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer: effect of b-value distribution on repeatability and cancer characterization.

Authors:  Harri Merisaari; Jussi Toivonen; Marko Pesola; Pekka Taimen; Peter J Boström; Tapio Pahikkala; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.

Authors:  Dai Feng; Giuliana Cortese; Richard Baumgartner
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial.

Authors:  Ivan Jambor; Anna Kuisma; Susan Ramadan; Riikka Huovinen; Minna Sandell; Sami Kajander; Jukka Kemppainen; Esa Kauppila; Joakim Auren; Harri Merisaari; Jani Saunavaara; Tommi Noponen; Heikki Minn; Hannu J Aronen; Marko Seppänen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.

Authors:  Lejla Hotilovac
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Small-sample precision of ROC-related estimates.

Authors:  Blaise Hanczar; Jianping Hua; Chao Sima; John Weinstein; Michael Bittner; Edward R Dougherty
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2) : correlation with Gleason score and repeatability of region of interest analysis.

Authors:  Jussi Toivonen; Harri Merisaari; Marko Pesola; Pekka Taimen; Peter J Boström; Tapio Pahikkala; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Fitting methods for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of prostate cancer on region of interest level: Repeatability and gleason score prediction.

Authors:  Harri Merisaari; Parisa Movahedi; Ileana M Perez; Jussi Toivonen; Marko Pesola; Pekka Taimen; Peter J Boström; Tapio Pahikkala; Aida Kiviniemi; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Prostate cancer detection with multi-parametric MRI: logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Deanna L Langer; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Andrew J Evans; John Trachtenberg; Brian C Wilson; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Stratification bias in low signal microarray studies.

Authors:  Brian J Parker; Simon Günter; Justin Bedo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Oculomotor deficits in Parkinson's disease: Increasing sensitivity using multivariate approaches.

Authors:  Oliver Bredemeyer; Salil Patel; James J FitzGerald; Chrystalina A Antoniades
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-08-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.