Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Sixteen-years' experience with ceramic hip prostheses.

Literature DB >> 1516330

Sixteen-years' experience with ceramic hip prostheses.

Abstract

The introduction of alumina ceramic combined with the self-locking principle by surface increase has many followers. There is no manufacturing company in the world that does not produce self-locking hip prostheses with ceramic components. Despite increased interim results with conventional prostheses by improved cement technique, the self-locking principle with wear resistant ceramic components is better, at least in young, active patients.

Entities: Chemical Species

Mesh：

Substances：

Year: 1992 PMID： 1516330

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res ISSN： 0009-921X Impact factor: 4.176

Keyword Cloud
Cited

11 in total

1. The influence of acetabular cup angle on the wear of "BIOLOX Forte" alumina ceramic bearing couples in a hip joint simulator.

Authors: J E Nevelos; E Ingham; C Doyle; A B Nevelos; J Fisher
Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 3.896

2. Clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament retaining TKA with alumina ceramic condylar prosthesis: comparison to Co-Cr alloy prosthesis.

Authors: Tokifumi Majima; Kazunori Yasuda; Hidenobu Tago; Yoshimitu Aoki; Akio Minami
Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2007-11-03 Impact factor: 4.342

Sixteen-years' experience with ceramic hip prostheses.

1. The influence of acetabular cup angle on the wear of "BIOLOX Forte" alumina ceramic bearing couples in a hip joint simulator.

2. Clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament retaining TKA with alumina ceramic condylar prosthesis: comparison to Co-Cr alloy prosthesis.

3. The ceramic cup type Lindenhof. Results 10-14 years after implantation.

Review 4. Thirty years of experience with alumina-on-alumina bearings in total hip arthroplasty.

5. Is there a risk in placing a ceramic head on a previously implanted trunion?

6. Does acetabular inclination angle affect survivorship of alumina-ceramic articulations?

Review 7. Strategies for head and inlay exchange in revision hip arthroplasty.

8. Ceramic-ceramic bearing decreases osteolysis: a 20-year study versus ceramic-polyethylene on the contralateral hip.

9. Retrieval analysis of alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couples.

10. Long-term results of cementless hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic articulation.