Literature DB >> 6235321

Automatic aftereffects in two-choice reaction time: a mathematical representation of some concepts.

E Soetens, M Deboeck, J Hueting.   

Abstract

A mathematical model is developed to describe sequential effects in two-choice reaction time experiments with a short response-stimulus interval. Evidence is briefly discussed that in conditions with short response-stimulus intervals, automatic aftereffects dominate sequential effects, and the influence of subjective expectancy can be neglected. In these conditions the model premises three components of automatic aftereffects--facilitation, inhibition, and noise, with a common decay factor. Influence of response-stimulus interval and practice on sequential effects are examined and related to parameter changes in the proposed single-decay model. The decrease of automatic aftereffects with increasing response-stimulus interval is primarily ascribed to an increasing decay factor. The parameter representation of the model also clarifies the issue of the disappearance of automatic aftereffects with practice. It shows a gradual fading of inhibition in the initial stages of practice, together with a slower decrease of the facilitation effect. The single-decay model provides a satisfactory explanation for the processes involved in compatible two-choice reaction time with short response-stimulus interval.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6235321     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.4.581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Sequence learning and sequential effects.

Authors:  E Soetens; A Melis; W Notebaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-25

2.  Automaticity in fast lexical decision sequential effects: much like telling left from right.

Authors:  Roderick Garton; John A Davidson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-04

3.  Perceptual Decision-Making: Biases in Post-Error Reaction Times Explained by Attractor Network Dynamics.

Authors:  Kevin Berlemont; Jean-Pierre Nadal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time tasks: decomposition and synthesis of mechanisms.

Authors:  Juan Gao; Kongfatt Wong-Lin; Philip Holmes; Patrick Simen; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Can post-error dynamics explain sequential reaction time patterns?

Authors:  Stephanie Goldfarb; Kongfatt Wong-Lin; Michael Schwemmer; Naomi Ehrich Leonard; Philip Holmes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-16

7.  Trial-by-trial changes in a priori informational value of external cues and subjective expectancies in human auditory attention.

Authors:  Antonio Arjona; Carlos M Gómez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.