Literature DB >> 1011006

Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: automatic facilitation or subjective expectancy?

N H Kirby.   

Abstract

A repetition effect is said to occur in a two-choice reaction time (RT) task when the RT for a repeated signal or response is faster than the RT for a new signal or response. An alternation effect is said to occur when the RT for a new signal or response is faster than for a repeated signal or response. A change from a repetition effect to an alternation effect was found across three response-stimulus intervals ranging from 50 msec to 2,000 msec. An analysis was also carried out of the higher-order sequential effects. Differences were found between those obtained from a repetition effect and those obtained from an alternation effect, suggesting that different factors operate in producing them. Two further experiments examined the roles of subjective expectancy and an automatic facilitation in determining these effects. Results suggested that while subjective expectancy operates at all response-stimulus intervals, an automatic facilitation operates only at short intervals.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1011006     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.2.4.567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  19 in total

1.  Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task.

Authors:  Raymond Y Cho; Leigh E Nystrom; Eric T Brown; Andrew D Jones; Todd S Braver; Philip J Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Sequence learning and sequential effects.

Authors:  E Soetens; A Melis; W Notebaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-25

3.  Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Crystal Au; Irene T Armstrong; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sequence effects in a spatial cueing task: endogenous orienting is sensitive to orienting in the preceding trial.

Authors:  Ellen M M Jongen; Fren T Y Smulders
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-05-19

5.  Hierarchically Organized Medial Frontal Cortex-Basal Ganglia Loops Selectively Control Task- and Response-Selection.

Authors:  Franziska M Korb; Jiefeng Jiang; Joseph A King; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The relative influences of priors and sensory evidence on an oculomotor decision variable during perceptual learning.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Chi-Tat Law; Patrick Connolly; Sharath Bennur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Automaticity in fast lexical decision sequential effects: much like telling left from right.

Authors:  Roderick Garton; John A Davidson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-04

8.  Optimizing sequential decisions in the drift-diffusion model.

Authors:  Khanh P Nguyen; Krešimir Josić; Zachary P Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.223

9.  Farey Trees Explain Sequential Effects in Choice Response Time.

Authors:  Colin T Annand; Sheila M Fleming; John G Holden
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time tasks: decomposition and synthesis of mechanisms.

Authors:  Juan Gao; Kongfatt Wong-Lin; Philip Holmes; Patrick Simen; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.026

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.