Literature DB >> 15155823

Balanced-PCR amplification allows unbiased identification of genomic copy changes in minute cell and tissue samples.

Gang Wang1, Cameron Brennan, Martha Rook, Jia Liu Wolfe, Christopher Leo, Lynda Chin, Hongjie Pan, Wei-Hua Liu, Brendan Price, G Mike Makrigiorgos.   

Abstract

Analysis of genomic DNA derived from cells and fresh or fixed tissues often requires whole genome amplification prior to microarray screening. Technical hurdles to this process are the introduction of amplification bias and/or the inhibitory effects of formalin fixation on DNA amplification. Here we demonstrate a balanced-PCR procedure that allows unbiased amplification of genomic DNA from fresh or modestly degraded paraffin-embedded DNA samples. Following digestion and ligation of a target and a control genome with distinct linkers, the two are mixed and amplified in a single PCR, thereby avoiding biases associated with PCR saturation and impurities. We demonstrate genome-wide retention of allelic differences following balanced-PCR amplification of DNA from breast cancer and normal human cells and genomic profiling by array-CGH (cDNA arrays, 100 kb resolution) and by real-time PCR (single gene resolution). Comparison of balanced-PCR with multiple displacement amplification (MDA) demonstrates equivalent performance between the two when intact genomic DNA is used. When DNA from paraffin-embedded samples is used, balanced PCR overcomes problems associated with modest DNA degradation and produces unbiased amplification whereas MDA does not. Balanced-PCR allows amplification and recovery of modestly degraded genomic DNA for subsequent retrospective analysis of human tumors with known outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15155823      PMCID: PMC419625          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gnh070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  31 in total

1.  Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays.

Authors:  J R Pollack; C M Perou; A A Alizadeh; M B Eisen; A Pergamenschikov; C F Williams; S S Jeffrey; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number.

Authors:  A M Snijders; N Nowak; R Segraves; S Blackwood; N Brown; J Conroy; G Hamilton; A K Hindle; B Huey; K Kimura; S Law; K Myambo; J Palmer; B Ylstra; J P Yue; J W Gray; A N Jain; D Pinkel; D G Albertson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Whole genome amplification--applications and advances.

Authors:  Trevor L Hawkins; John C Detter; Paul M Richardson
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  Quantitative mapping of amplicon structure by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene.

Authors:  D G Albertson; B Ylstra; R Segraves; C Collins; S H Dairkee; D Kowbel; W L Kuo; J W Gray; D Pinkel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Microarray and histopathological analysis of tumours: the future and the past?

Authors:  S R Lakhani; A Ashworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) gene amplification is a better indicator of poor prognosis than protein over-expression in operable breast-cancer patients.

Authors:  G Riou; M C Mathieu; M Barrois; M L Le Bihan; J C Ahomadegbe; J Bénard; M G Lê
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Amplification of EIF3S3 gene is associated with advanced stage in prostate cancer.

Authors:  O Saramäki; N Willi; O Bratt; T C Gasser; P Koivisto; N N Nupponen; L Bubendorf; T Visakorpi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Comparative genomic hybridization of fine needle aspirates from breast carcinomas.

Authors:  N G Bürki; R Caduff; H Walt; C Moll; T Pejovic; U Haller; D C Ward
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Discovery of new DNA amplification loci in prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  A El Gedaily; L Bubendorf; N Willi; W Fu; J Richter; H Moch; M J Mihatsch; G Sauter; T C Gasser
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  The feasibility of using fine needle aspiration from primary breast cancers for cDNA microarray analyses.

Authors:  Laura Assersohn; Lisa Gangi; Yingdong Zhao; Mitch Dowsett; Richard Simon; Trevor J Powles; Edison T Liu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  21 in total

1.  Single molecule transcription profiling with AFM.

Authors:  Jason Reed; Bud Mishra; Bede Pittenger; Sergei Magonov; Joshua Troke; Michael A Teitell; James K Gimzewski
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 3.874

2.  DNA amplification method tolerant to sample degradation.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Elizabeth Maher; Cameron Brennan; Lynda Chin; Christopher Leo; Manjit Kaur; Penny Zhu; Martha Rook; Jia Liu Wolfe; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Amplification of whole tumor genomes and gene-by-gene mapping of genomic aberrations from limited sources of fresh-frozen and paraffin-embedded DNA.

Authors:  Markus Bredel; Claudia Bredel; Dejan Juric; Young Kim; Hannes Vogel; Griffith R Harsh; Lawrence D Recht; Jonathan R Pollack; Branimir I Sikic
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Whole genome amplification of plasma-circulating DNA enables expanded screening for allelic imbalance in plasma.

Authors:  Jin Li; Lyndsay Harris; Harvey Mamon; Matthew H Kulke; Wei-Hua Liu; Penny Zhu; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  A procedure for highly specific, sensitive, and unbiased whole-genome amplification.

Authors:  Xinghua Pan; Alexander Eckehart Urban; Dean Palejev; Vincent Schulz; Fabian Grubert; Yiping Hu; Michael Snyder; Sherman M Weissman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Multiplex amplification coupled with COLD-PCR and high resolution melting enables identification of low-abundance mutations in cancer samples with low DNA content.

Authors:  Coren A Milbury; Clark C Chen; Harvey Mamon; Pingfang Liu; Sandro Santagata; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Genomic profiling by DNA amplification of laser capture microdissected tissues and array CGH.

Authors:  Joana Cardoso; Lia Molenaar; Renée X de Menezes; Carla Rosenberg; Hans Morreau; Gabriela Möslein; Riccardo Fodde; Judith M Boer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Array CGH reveals genomic aberrations in human emphysema.

Authors:  Jin Soo Choi; Woon Jeong Lee; Seung Ho Baik; Hyoung Kyu Yoon; Kweon-Haeng Lee; Yeul Hong Kim; Young Lim; Young-Pil Wang
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.584

9.  HOX gene analysis of endothelial cell differentiation in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Namhyun Chung; Bo Keun Jee; Song Wha Chae; Yang-Whan Jeon; Kweon Haeng Lee; Hyoung Kyun Rha
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  DNA degradation test predicts success in whole-genome amplification from diverse clinical samples.

Authors:  Fengfei Wang; Lilin Wang; Christine Briggs; Ewa Sicinska; Sandra M Gaston; Harvey Mamon; Matthew H Kulke; Raffaella Zamponi; Massimo Loda; Elizabeth Maher; Shuji Ogino; Charles S Fuchs; Jin Li; Carlos Hader; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 5.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.