PURPOSE: Our aims in this pilot study were to determine whether fine needle aspirates (FNAs) provide a sufficient quantity of mRNA for cDNA microarray analysis, produce a set of quality control criteria to accept individual arrays, and determine whether gene expression profiles obtained from FNAs were representative of the source tumor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-seven women with breast cancer for treatment with primary surgery had a FNA before and at the time of surgery, and a portion of excised tumor was taken for array analysis. Control experiments were performed using two Ewing's sarcoma xenograft models. mRNA was extracted from the samples and hybridized with the reference (MCF7 cell line) on cDNA microarrays. Statistical methods were applied to identify acceptability criteria for the arrays. RESULTS: Statistical analyses demonstrated that an adequate array could be identified by calculating the SD of the log of fluorescence intensities from the arrays. Using this criterion, only 4 of the 27 patients (15%) had FNA samples suitable for array analysis. Gene expression profiles from the FNAs closely resembled that of the corresponding source tumors and were clearly distinguished from FNAs derived from the xenografts. CONCLUSIONS: SD is a useful quality index for the clinical application of cDNA microarrays. This "proof of principle" study demonstrates that FNAs from primary breast cancers can be used for microarray analysis, although without amplification, it is feasible in only a small proportion of patients. For this to be clinically useful, validated amplification techniques for FNA samples are probably required.
PURPOSE: Our aims in this pilot study were to determine whether fine needle aspirates (FNAs) provide a sufficient quantity of mRNA for cDNA microarray analysis, produce a set of quality control criteria to accept individual arrays, and determine whether gene expression profiles obtained from FNAs were representative of the source tumor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-seven women with breast cancer for treatment with primary surgery had a FNA before and at the time of surgery, and a portion of excised tumor was taken for array analysis. Control experiments were performed using two Ewing's sarcoma xenograft models. mRNA was extracted from the samples and hybridized with the reference (MCF7 cell line) on cDNA microarrays. Statistical methods were applied to identify acceptability criteria for the arrays. RESULTS: Statistical analyses demonstrated that an adequate array could be identified by calculating the SD of the log of fluorescence intensities from the arrays. Using this criterion, only 4 of the 27 patients (15%) had FNA samples suitable for array analysis. Gene expression profiles from the FNAs closely resembled that of the corresponding source tumors and were clearly distinguished from FNAs derived from the xenografts. CONCLUSIONS: SD is a useful quality index for the clinical application of cDNA microarrays. This "proof of principle" study demonstrates that FNAs from primary breast cancers can be used for microarray analysis, although without amplification, it is feasible in only a small proportion of patients. For this to be clinically useful, validated amplification techniques for FNA samples are probably required.
Authors: Gavin J Gordon; Levi A Deters; Matthew D Nitz; Barry C Lieberman; Beow Y Yeap; Raphael Bueno Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Assunta De Rienzo; Lingsheng Dong; Beow Y Yeap; Roderick V Jensen; William G Richards; Gavin J Gordon; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Craig G Rogers; Jonathon A Ditlev; Min-Han Tan; Jun Sugimura; Chao-Nan Qian; Jeff Cooper; Brian Lane; Michael A Jewett; Richard J Kahnoski; Eric J Kort; Bin T Teh Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 4.060