Literature DB >> 16436631

Whole genome amplification of plasma-circulating DNA enables expanded screening for allelic imbalance in plasma.

Jin Li1, Lyndsay Harris, Harvey Mamon, Matthew H Kulke, Wei-Hua Liu, Penny Zhu, G Mike Makrigiorgos.   

Abstract

Apoptotic and necrotic tumor cells release DNA into plasma, providing an accessible tumor biomarker. Tumor-released plasma-circulating DNA can be screened for tumor-specific genetic changes, including mutation, methylation, or allelic imbalance. However, technical problems relating to the quantity and quality of DNA collected from plasma hinder downstream genetic screening and reduce biomarker detection sensitivity. Here, we present a new methodology, blunt-end ligation-mediated whole genome amplification (BL-WGA), that efficiently amplifies small apoptotic fragments (<200 bp) as well as intermediate and large necrotic fragments (>5 kb) and enables reliable high-throughput analysis of plasma-circulating DNA. In a single-tube reaction, purified double-stranded DNA was blunted with T4 DNA polymerase, self-ligated or cross-ligated with T4 DNA ligase and amplified via random primer-initiated multiple displacement amplification. Using plasma DNA from breast cancer patients and normal controls, we demonstrate that BL-WGA amplified the plasma-circulating genome by approximately 1000-fold. Of 25 informative polymorphic sites screened via polymerase chain reaction-denaturating high-performance liquid chromatography, 24 (95%) were correctly determined by BL-WGA to be allelic retention or imbalance compared to 44% by multiple displacement amplification. By enabling target magnification and application of high-throughput genome analysis, BL-WGA improves sensitivity for detection of circulating tumor-specific biomarkers from bodily fluids or for recovery of nucleic acids from suboptimally stored specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436631      PMCID: PMC1867563          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.050074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  49 in total

1.  Plasma DNA K-ras mutations in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  H E Mulcahy; J Lyautey; C Lederrey; X Q Chen; F Lefort; V Vasioukhin; P Anker; E M Alstead; M J Farthing; M Stroun
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  A PCR-based amplification method retaining the quantitative difference between two complex genomes.

Authors:  G Mike Makrigiorgos; Subrata Chakrabarti; Yuzhi Zhang; Manjit Kaur; Brendan D Price
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-08-05       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Real time quantitative PCR.

Authors:  C A Heid; J Stevens; K J Livak; P M Williams
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Microsatellite alterations in serum DNA of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K Kölble; O M Ullrich; H Pidde; B Barthel; J Diermann; B Rudolph; M Dietel; P M Schlag; S Scherneck
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.662

5.  Microsatellite alterations in plasma DNA of small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  X Q Chen; M Stroun; J L Magnenat; L P Nicod; A M Kurt; J Lyautey; C Lederrey; P Anker
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) used in the detection of germline and somatic mutations.

Authors:  W Liu; D I Smith; K J Rechtzigel; S N Thibodeau; C D James
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Molecular detection of genetic alterations in the serum of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  K Hibi; C R Robinson; S Booker; L Wu; S R Hamilton; D Sidransky; J Jen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Determination of loss of heterozygosity in frozen and paraffin embedded tumors by denaturating high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC).

Authors:  E Kleymenova; C L Walker
Journal:  J Biochem Biophys Methods       Date:  2001-01-30

9.  Assessment of plasma DNA levels, allelic imbalance, and CA 125 as diagnostic tests for cancer.

Authors:  Hsueh-Wei Chang; Shing M Lee; Steven N Goodman; Gad Singer; Sarah K R Cho; Lori J Sokoll; Fredrick J Montz; Richard Roden; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan; Robert J Kurman; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Unbiased whole-genome amplification directly from clinical samples.

Authors:  Seiyu Hosono; A Fawad Faruqi; Frank B Dean; Yuefen Du; Zhenyu Sun; Xiaohong Wu; Jing Du; Stephen F Kingsmore; Michael Egholm; Roger S Lasken
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  16 in total

1.  Mapping of genomic EGFRvIII deletions in glioblastoma: insight into rearrangement mechanisms and biomarker development.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Koga; Bin Li; Javier M Figueroa; Bing Ren; Clark C Chen; Bob S Carter; Frank B Furnari
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Multiplex amplification coupled with COLD-PCR and high resolution melting enables identification of low-abundance mutations in cancer samples with low DNA content.

Authors:  Coren A Milbury; Clark C Chen; Harvey Mamon; Pingfang Liu; Sandro Santagata; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Detection of EGFR mutations in plasma DNA from lung cancer patients by mass spectrometry genotyping is predictive of tumor EGFR status and response to EGFR inhibitors.

Authors:  Marie Brevet; Melissa L Johnson; Christopher G Azzoli; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Noninvasive detection of EGFR T790M in gefitinib or erlotinib resistant non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yanan Kuang; Andrew Rogers; Beow Y Yeap; Lilin Wang; Mike Makrigiorgos; Kristi Vetrand; Sara Thiede; Robert J Distel; Pasi A Jänne
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Cell-free DNA in blood is a potential diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer.

Authors:  Bo Gong; Jianxiang Xue; Jing Yu; Haichuan Li; Heyu Hu; Hsuehheng Yen; Jinyin Hu; Qianggang Dong; Fuhua Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Performance of whole-genome amplified DNA isolated from serum and plasma on high-density single nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Authors:  Daniel T Croft; Rick M Jordan; Heather L Patney; Craig D Shriver; Marina N Vernalis; Trevor J Orchard; Darrell L Ellsworth
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  DNA degradation test predicts success in whole-genome amplification from diverse clinical samples.

Authors:  Fengfei Wang; Lilin Wang; Christine Briggs; Ewa Sicinska; Sandra M Gaston; Harvey Mamon; Matthew H Kulke; Raffaella Zamponi; Massimo Loda; Elizabeth Maher; Shuji Ogino; Charles S Fuchs; Jin Li; Carlos Hader; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Preferential amplification of apoptotic DNA from plasma: potential for enhancing detection of minor DNA alterations in circulating DNA.

Authors:  Harvey Mamon; Carlos Hader; Jin Li; Lilin Wang; Matthew Kulke; Giulia Amicarelli; Erlet Shehi; Daniel Adlerstein; Kristin Roper; Leah Killion; Susanne Hooshmand; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Whole genome amplification of degraded and nondegraded DNA for forensic purposes.

Authors:  Agnieszka Maciejewska; Joanna Jakubowska; Ryszard Pawłowski
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  FLAG assay as a novel method for real-time signal generation during PCR: application to detection and genotyping of KRAS codon 12 mutations.

Authors:  Giulia Amicarelli; Erlet Shehi; G Mike Makrigiorgos; Daniel Adlerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.