Literature DB >> 15152689

Quantitative measurement of MLC leaf displacements using an electronic portal image device.

Yong Yang1, Lei Xing.   

Abstract

The success of an IMRT treatment relies on the positioning accuracy of the MLC (multileaf collimator) leaves for both step-and-shoot and dynamic deliveries. In practice, however, there exists no effective and quantitative means for routine MLC QA and this has become one of the bottleneck problems in IMRT implementation. In this work we present an electronic portal image device (EPID) based method for fast and accurate measurement of MLC leaf positions at arbitrary locations within the 40 cm x 40 cm radiation field. The new technique utilizes the fact that the integral signal in a small region of interest (ROI) is a sensitive and reliable indicator of the leaf displacement. In this approach, the integral signal at a ROI was expressed as a weighted sum of the contributions from the displacements of the leaf above the point and the adjacent leaves. The weighting factors or linear coefficients of the system equations were determined by fitting the integral signal data for a group of pre-designed MLC leaf sequences to the known leaf displacements that were intentionally introduced during the creation of the leaf sequences. Once the calibration is done, the system can be used for routine MLC leaf positioning QA to detect possible leaf errors. A series of tests was carried out to examine the functionality and accuracy of the technique. Our results show that the proposed technique is potentially superior to the conventional edge-detecting approach in two aspects: (i) it deals with the problem in a systematic approach and allows us to take into account the influence of the adjacent MLC leaves effectively; and (ii) it may improve the signal-to-noise ratio and is thus capable of quantitatively measuring extremely small leaf positional displacements. Our results indicate that the technique can detect a leaf positional error as small as 0.1 mm at an arbitrary point within the field in the absence of EPID set-up error and 0.3 mm when the uncertainty is considered. Given its simplicity, efficiency and accuracy, we believe that the technique is ideally suitable for routine MLC leaf positioning QA.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15152689     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/8/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Quality assurance of dynamic parameters in volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  A Manikandan; B Sarkar; R Holla; T R Vivek; N Sujatha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The use of EPID-measured leaf sequence files for IMRT dose reconstruction in adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Louis Lee; Weihua Mao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  DRR and portal image registration for automatic patient positioning in radiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Ma Consuelo Bastida-Jumilla; Jorge Larrey-Ruiz; Rafael Verdú-Monedero; Juan Morales-Sánchez; José-Luis Sancho-Gómez
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Comparison of MLC error sensitivity of various commercial devices for VMAT pre-treatment quality assurance.

Authors:  Masahide Saito; Naoki Sano; Yuki Shibata; Kengo Kuriyama; Takafumi Komiyama; Kan Marino; Shinichi Aoki; Kazunari Ashizawa; Kazuya Yoshizawa; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Quality assurance of MLC leaf position accuracy and relative dose effect at the MLC abutment region using an electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hajime Yamaguchi; Hisao Kizaki; Masahiko Koizumi; Toshiyuki Ogata; Yutaka Takahashi; Yasuo Yoshioka
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  On flattening filter-free portal dosimetry.

Authors:  Eduardo Pardo; Juan Castro Novais; María Yolanda Molina López; Sheila Ruiz Maqueda
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.