Literature DB >> 15134474

A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation.

Han Cheng1, Justin K Barnett, Abhiram S Vilupuru, Jason D Marsack, Sanjeev Kasthurirangan, Raymond A Applegate, Austin Roorda.   

Abstract

Wave aberrations were measured with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS) in the right eye of a large young adult population when accommodative demands of 0, 3, and 6 D were presented to the tested eye through a Badal system. Three SHWS images were recorded at each accommodative demand and wave aberrations were computed over a 5-mm pupil (through 6th order Zernike polynomials). The accommodative response was calculated from the Zernike defocus over the central 3-mm diameter zone. Among all individual Zernike terms, spherical aberration showed the greatest change with accommodation. The change of spherical aberration was always negative, and was proportional to the change in accommodative response. Coma and astigmatism also changed with accommodation, but the direction of the change was variable. Despite the large inter-subject variability, the population average of the root mean square for all aberrations (excluding defocus) remained constant for accommodative levels up to 3.0 D. Even though aberrations change with accommodation, the magnitude of the aberration change remains less than the magnitude of the uncorrected aberrations, even at high accommodative levels. Therefore, a typical eye will benefit over the entire accommodative range (0-6 D) if aberrations are corrected for distance viewing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15134474     DOI: 10.1167/4.4.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  65 in total

1.  Wave aberrations of the isolated crystalline lens.

Authors:  Austin Roorda; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  [The influence of eye movements on monochromatic wavefront aberrations].

Authors:  D Lemm; S Jurkutat; J Dawczynski; R Vollandt; J Strobel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Reproducibility of optical quality parameters measured at objective and subjective best focuses in a double-pass system.

Authors:  Ai-Lian Hu; Li-Ya Qiao; Ye Zhang; Xiao-Gu Cai; Lei Li; Xiu-Hua Wan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Monochromatic ocular wave aberrations in young monkeys.

Authors:  Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Chea-su Kee; Li-Fang Hung; Ying Qiao-Grider; Austin Roorda; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Two-dimensional simulation of eccentric photorefraction images for ametropes: factors influencing the measurement.

Authors:  Yifei Wu; Larry N Thibos; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Frank Thorn; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Optical quality of the eye degraded by time-varying wavefront aberrations with tear film dynamics.

Authors:  Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Shizuka Koh; Sayuri Ninomiya; Naoyuki Maeda; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Wave aberrations in rhesus monkeys with vision-induced ametropias.

Authors:  Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Chea-Su Kee; Li-Fang Hung; Ying Qiao-Grider; Juan Huang; Austin Roorda; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.