Literature DB >> 11562930

Education about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: patient preferences for a computer program or genetic counselor.

M J Green1, A M McInerney, B B Biesecker, N Fost.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe and compare patient preferences for a genetic counselor or an interactive computer program for various components of genetic education and counseling for breast cancer susceptibility. As part of a randomized intervention study on genetics education and counseling for breast cancer risk, 29 women at moderate risk were educated by both a genetic counselor and an interactive computer program. After both educational interventions, participants completed Likert-style and open-ended questionnaires about what they liked most and least about each intervention, and whether they preferred the counselor or computer for a variety of tasks. Participants were largely satisfied with both the computer program and the genetic counselor. A majority preferred the genetic counselor for addressing their concerns, discussing options and alternatives, being sensitive to emotional concerns, helping to make a decision, being a good listener, assuring understanding, helping to make a good choice, helping to understand genes and breast cancer, telling them what they needed to know, being respectful, setting a relaxed tone, and putting them at ease. However, a majority of the women either preferred the computer program or were neutral about allowing patients to learn at their own pace, helping to avoid embarrassment, making good use of time, explaining genes and breast cancer, and treating the patient as an adult. Qualitative analysis of open-ended questions affirmed that patients valued the personal interactions with the counselors, and liked having their specific questions answered. They liked that the computer was self-paced, informative and private, and could be used without causing embarrassment. We concluded that a computer literate, mostly white group of women at moderate risk for inherited susceptibility to breast cancer preferred interacting with a genetic counselor for personal, individualized components of the genetic counseling process, but accepted or preferred a computer program for being self-paced, private, and informative. By incorporating such a computer program into the genetic education process, it is possible that genetic counselors would be able to spend more time performing the personal, individualized components of genetic counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11562930     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  26 in total

1.  Explaining Mendelian inheritance in genetic consultations: an IPR study of counselor and counselee experiences.

Authors:  Theodora Gale; Sara Pasalodos-Sanchez; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar; Georgina Hall; Rhona MacLeod
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Impact of computer-assisted data collection, evaluation and management on the cancer genetic counselor's time providing patient care.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Dawn E McIlvried
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Community attitudes towards a Jewish community BRCA1/2 testing program.

Authors:  Nicole Cousens; Rajneesh Kaur; Bettina Meiser; Lesley Andrews
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  Communication and technology in genetic counseling for familial cancer.

Authors:  H T Lynch; C Snyder; M Stacey; B Olson; S K Peterson; S Buxbaum; T Shaw; P M Lynch
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Patient outcomes associated with group and individual genetic counseling formats.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Wendy Kohlmann; Kory Jasperson; Amanda Gammon; Bob Wong; Anita Kinney
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: effects on duration and content of counseling sessions.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Lois C Friedman; Gregory R Harper; Wendy S Rubinstein; June A Peters; David T Mauger
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Interventions to improve patient education regarding multifactorial genetic conditions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine G Meilleur; Marguerite T Littleton-Kearney
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Delivering information about cancer genetics via letter to patients at low and moderate risk of familial cancer: a pilot study in Wales.

Authors:  C Phelps; K Platt; L France; J Gray; R Iredale
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Gregory R Harper; Lois C Friedman; Wendy S Rubinstein; David T Mauger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Promotion of cancer family history awareness: Jameslink Cancer Risk Assessment Tool at community health fairs.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Kyle Porter; Amber Remy; Judith A Westman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.