Literature DB >> 15129704

A realistic 3-D gated cardiac phantom for quality control of gated myocardial perfusion SPET: the Amsterdam gated (AGATE) cardiac phantom.

Jacco J N Visser1, Ellinor Busemann Sokole, Hein J Verberne, Jan B A Habraken, Huybert J F van de Stadt, Joris E N Jaspers, Morgan Shehata, Paul M Heeman, Berthe L F van Eck-Smit.   

Abstract

A realistic 3-D gated cardiac phantom with known left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fractions (EFs) was produced to evaluate quantitative measurements obtained from gated myocardial single-photon emission tomography (SPET). The 3-D gated cardiac phantom was designed and constructed to fit into the Data Spectrum anthropomorphic torso phantom. Flexible silicone membranes form the inner and outer walls of the simulated left ventricle. Simulated LV volumes can be varied within the range 45-200 ml. The LV volume curve has a smooth and realistic clinical shape that is produced by a specially shaped cam connected to a piston. A fixed 70-ml stroke volume is applied for EF measurements. An ECG signal is produced at maximum LV filling by a controller unit connected to the pump. This gated cardiac phantom will be referred to as the Amsterdam 3-D gated cardiac phantom, or, in short, the AGATE cardiac phantom. SPET data were acquired with a triple-head SPET system. Data were reconstructed using filtered back-projection following pre-filtering and further processed with the Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) software to determine LV volume and EF values. Ungated studies were performed to measure LV volumes ranging from 45 ml to 200 ml. The QGS-determined LV volumes were systematically underestimated. For different LV combinations, the stroke volumes measured were consistent at 60-61 ml for 8-frame studies and 63-65 ml for 16-frame studies. QGS-determined EF values were slightly overestimated between 1.25% EF units for 8-frame studies and 3.25% EF units for 16-frame studies. In conclusion, the AGATE cardiac phantom offers possibilities for quality control, testing and validation of the whole gated cardiac SPET sequence, and testing of different acquisition and processing parameters and software.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129704     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1352-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  23 in total

1.  A mathematical model of motion of the heart for use in generating source and attenuation maps for simulating emission imaging.

Authors:  P H Pretorius; M A King; B M Tsui; K J LaCroix; W Xia
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  The role of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making.

Authors:  D S Berman; G Germano; L J Shaw
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  The use of gated perfusion scanning in the assessment of left ventricular volume.

Authors:  M R Rees; V Parkin; P Wilde
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Gated SPET quantification of small hearts: mathematical simulation and clinical application.

Authors:  K Nakajima; J Taki; T Higuchi; M Kawano; M Taniguchi; K Maruhashi; S Sakazume; N Tonami
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-09

5.  Quantification of SPECT myocardial perfusion images: methodology and validation of the Yale-CQ method.

Authors:  Y H Liu; A J Sinusas; P DeMan; B L Zaret; F J Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  An investigation of the estimation of ejection fractions and cardiac volumes by a quantitative gated SPECT software package in simulated gated SPECT images.

Authors:  A D Achtert; M A King; S T Dahlberg; P H Pretorius; K J LaCroix; B M Tsui
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Left ventricular ejection fraction from gated SPET myocardial perfusion studies: a method based on the radial distribution of count rate density across the myocardial wall.

Authors:  H Everaert; P R Franken; P Flamen; M Goris; A Momen; A Bossuyt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-12

8.  Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function using technetium-99m sestamibi ECG-gated single-photon emission tomography.

Authors:  K T Yang; H D Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1998-05

9.  Reproducibility and accuracy of gated SPECT for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: experimental validation using MRI.

Authors:  E Vallejo; D P Dione; W L Bruni; R T Constable; P P Borek; J P Soares; J G Carr; S G Condos; F J Wackers; A J Sinusas
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Accuracy of ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated myocardial SPECT: comparison of 4 software programs.

Authors:  K Nakajima; T Higuchi; J Taki; M Kawano; N Tonami
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  12 in total

1.  Myocardial gated SPECT phantom.

Authors:  Boguslaw Stefaniak; Witold Cholewinski; Anna Tarkowska
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Influence of collimator choice and simulated clinical conditions on 123I-MIBG heart/mediastinum ratios: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hein J Verberne; Christel Feenstra; W Matthijs de Jong; G Aernout Somsen; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Ellinor Busemann Sokole
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Multicenter intercomparison assessment of consistency of left ventricular function from a gated cardiac SPECT phantom.

Authors:  Hein J Verberne; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Astrid Spijkerboer; Marcel Stokkel; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Ellinor Busemann Sokole
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Dual gated PET/CT imaging of small targets of the heart: method description and testing with a dynamic heart phantom.

Authors:  Tommi Kokki; Hannu T Sipilä; Mika Teräs; Tommi Noponen; Nicolas Durand-Schaefer; Riku Klén; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Evaluation of the Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) software program in the presence of large perfusion defects.

Authors:  Yves G C J America; Jeroen J Bax; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Ernest K J Pauwels; Ernst E Van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Is 16-frame really superior to 8-frame gated SPECT for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction? Comparison of two simultaneously acquired gated SPECT studies.

Authors:  Giulia Montelatici; Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Manjola Dona; Alberto Pupi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Left ventricular function assessment using 123I/99mTc dual-isotope acquisition with two semi-conductor cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) cameras: a gated cardiac phantom study.

Authors:  Tanguy Blaire; Alban Bailliez; Fayçal Ben Bouallegue; Dimitri Bellevre; Denis Agostini; Alain Manrique
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2016-11-11

8.  Accuracy of Left Ventricular Cavity Volume and Ejection Fraction for Conventional Estimation Methods and 3D Surface Fitting.

Authors:  Walter G O'Dell
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Variations in 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) late heart mediastinal ratios in chronic heart failure: a need for standardisation and validation.

Authors:  Hein J Verberne; Jan B A Habraken; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Denis Agostini; Arnold F Jacobson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Evaluation of inter-departmental variability of ejection fraction and cardiac volumes in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using simulated data.

Authors:  Elin Trägårdh; Michael Ljungberg; Lars Edenbrandt; Eva Örndahl; Lena Johansson; Agneta Gustafsson; Cathrine Jonsson; Jessica Hagerman; Katrine Riklund; David Minarik
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2015-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.