UNLABELLED: Quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) has been used for computation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. This study evaluated, first, the effect of injected dose, time of imaging, and background activity on the reproducibility of QGS and, second, the accuracy of QGS, compared with cine MRI, for determining left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions in dogs with and without perfusion defects. METHODS: Sixteen dogs were subjected to either chronic occlusion of the circumflex artery (group I, no perfusion defect) or acute occlusion of the anterior descending coronary artery (group II, perfusion defect). Both groups underwent serial MRI and SPECT. RESULTS: ( QGS was very reproducible using the automated program (r = 0.99997). Correlation between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 15 and 45 min was poor after the low-dose injection (r = 0.54; SE = 9%) and only fair after the high-dose injection (r = 0.77; SE = 5%). Correlation was poor in the presence of significant background activity (r = 0.36; SE = 12%). Correlation between QGS left ventricular volumes and MRI was good for group I (end-diastolic volume, r = 0.86; end-systolic volume, r = 0.81) and only fair for group II (end-diastolic volume, r = 0.66; end-systolic volume, r = 0.69). The overall LVEF correlation between QGS and MRI was poor (r = 0.51). QGS LVEF (mean +/- SD, 42% +/- 3%) overestimated MRI LVEF (29% +/- 2%). CONCLUSION: QGS provides a highly reproducible estimate of LVEF. However, QGS is affected by changes in background activity, time of imaging, and injected dose. In the presence of perfusion defects, QGS overestimated volume relative to MRI. The correlation between QGS- and MRI-derived LVEF was poor in this canine model.
UNLABELLED: Quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) has been used for computation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. This study evaluated, first, the effect of injected dose, time of imaging, and background activity on the reproducibility of QGS and, second, the accuracy of QGS, compared with cine MRI, for determining left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions in dogs with and without perfusion defects. METHODS: Sixteen dogs were subjected to either chronic occlusion of the circumflex artery (group I, no perfusion defect) or acute occlusion of the anterior descending coronary artery (group II, perfusion defect). Both groups underwent serial MRI and SPECT. RESULTS: ( QGS was very reproducible using the automated program (r = 0.99997). Correlation between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 15 and 45 min was poor after the low-dose injection (r = 0.54; SE = 9%) and only fair after the high-dose injection (r = 0.77; SE = 5%). Correlation was poor in the presence of significant background activity (r = 0.36; SE = 12%). Correlation between QGS left ventricular volumes and MRI was good for group I (end-diastolic volume, r = 0.86; end-systolic volume, r = 0.81) and only fair for group II (end-diastolic volume, r = 0.66; end-systolic volume, r = 0.69). The overall LVEF correlation between QGS and MRI was poor (r = 0.51). QGS LVEF (mean +/- SD, 42% +/- 3%) overestimated MRI LVEF (29% +/- 2%). CONCLUSION: QGS provides a highly reproducible estimate of LVEF. However, QGS is affected by changes in background activity, time of imaging, and injected dose. In the presence of perfusion defects, QGS overestimated volume relative to MRI. The correlation between QGS- and MRI-derived LVEF was poor in this canine model.
Authors: T L Faber; J P Vansant; R I Pettigrew; J R Galt; M Blais; G Chatzimavroudis; C D Cooke; R D Folks; S M Waldrop; E Gurtler-Krawczynska; M D Wittry; E V Garcia Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Olivier De Winter; Pieter De Bondt; Christophe Van De Wiele; Guy De Backer; Rudi A Dierckx; Johan De Sutter Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Jacco J N Visser; Ellinor Busemann Sokole; Hein J Verberne; Jan B A Habraken; Huybert J F van de Stadt; Joris E N Jaspers; Morgan Shehata; Paul M Heeman; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.236