OBJECTIVE: Assess the state of women veterans' health research. DESIGN: Systematic review of studies that pertained specifically to or included explicit information about women veterans. A narrative synthesis of studies in 4 domains/topics was conducted: Stress of military life; Health and performance of military/VA women; Health services research/quality of care; and Psychiatric conditions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 182 studies. Of these, 2 were randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and the remainder used observational designs. Forty-five percent of studies were VA funded. We identified 77 studies pertaining to the stress of military life, of which 21 reported on sexual harassment or assault. Rates of harassment ranged from 55% to 79% and rates of sexual assault from 4.2% to 7.3% in active duty military women and 11% to 48% among women veterans. Forty-two studies concerned the health and performance of military/VA women, with 21 studies evaluating sexual assault and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and their effect on health. Fifty-nine studies assessed various aspects of health services research. Eight studies assessed quality of care and 5, patient satisfaction. Twenty-five studies assessed utilization and health care organization, and findings include that women veterans use the VA less than men, that gender-specific reasons for seeking care were common among female military and veteran personnel, that provision of gender-specific care increased women veterans' use of VA, and that virtually all VAs have available on-site basic women's health services. Fifty studies were classified as psychiatric; 31 of these were about the risk, prevalence, and treatment of PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: Most research on VA women's health is descriptive in nature and has concerned PTSD, sexual harassment and assault, the utilization and organization of care, and various psychiatric conditions. Experimental studies and studies of the quality of care are rare.
OBJECTIVE: Assess the state of women veterans' health research. DESIGN: Systematic review of studies that pertained specifically to or included explicit information about women veterans. A narrative synthesis of studies in 4 domains/topics was conducted: Stress of military life; Health and performance of military/VA women; Health services research/quality of care; and Psychiatric conditions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 182 studies. Of these, 2 were randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and the remainder used observational designs. Forty-five percent of studies were VA funded. We identified 77 studies pertaining to the stress of military life, of which 21 reported on sexual harassment or assault. Rates of harassment ranged from 55% to 79% and rates of sexual assault from 4.2% to 7.3% in active duty military women and 11% to 48% among women veterans. Forty-two studies concerned the health and performance of military/VA women, with 21 studies evaluating sexual assault and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and their effect on health. Fifty-nine studies assessed various aspects of health services research. Eight studies assessed quality of care and 5, patient satisfaction. Twenty-five studies assessed utilization and health care organization, and findings include that women veterans use the VA less than men, that gender-specific reasons for seeking care were common among female military and veteran personnel, that provision of gender-specific care increased women veterans' use of VA, and that virtually all VAs have available on-site basic women's health services. Fifty studies were classified as psychiatric; 31 of these were about the risk, prevalence, and treatment of PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: Most research on VA women's health is descriptive in nature and has concerned PTSD, sexual harassment and assault, the utilization and organization of care, and various psychiatric conditions. Experimental studies and studies of the quality of care are rare.
Authors: C C Engel; R Ursano; C Magruder; R Tartaglione; Z Jing; L A Labbate; S Debakey Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: L M McIntyre; M I Butterfield; K Nanda; K Parsey; K M Stechuchak; A W McChesney; C Koons; L A Bastian Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Katharine A Bradley; Kristen R Bush; Amee J Epler; Dorcas J Dobie; Tania M Davis; Jennifer L Sporleder; Charles Maynard; Marcia L Burman; Daniel R Kivlahan Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-04-14
Authors: Elizabeth M Yano; Lori A Bastian; Susan M Frayne; Alexandra L Howell; Linda R Lipson; Geraldine McGlynn; Paula P Schnurr; Margaret R Seaver; Ann M Spungen; Stephan D Fihn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Lori Bastian; Mark Trentalange; Terrence E Murphy; Melissa Skanderson; Heather Allore; Evelyn Reyes-Harvey; Natalya C Maisel; Vera Gaetano; Steven Wright; Sally Haskell; Cynthia Brandt Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: L S Savas; D L White; M Wieman; K Daci; S Fitzgerald; S Laday Smith; G Tan; D P Graham; J A Cully; H B El-Serag Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2008-09-09 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Elizabeth M Yano; Patricia Hayes; Steven Wright; Paula P Schnurr; Linda Lipson; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Donna L Washington Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.128