OBJECTIVE: Pediatricians are encountering body composition information more frequently, with percentage of body fat (%BF) measurement receiving particular attention as a result of the obesity epidemic. One confounding issue is that different methods may yield different %BF results in the same person. The objective of this study was to compare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with the criterion 4-compartment model (4-CM) for measurement of %BF in a large pediatric cohort and to assist pediatricians in appropriate interpretation of body composition information by recognizing differences between techniques. METHODS: Height, weight, anthropometrics, body density by underwater weighing, total body water by deuterium dilution, and bone mineral content and %BF by DXA (Lunar DPX/DPX-L) were measured in 411 healthy subjects, aged 6 to 18 years. Values for %BF by 4-CM and DXA were compared using regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean +/- standard deviation values for %BF by DXA (22.73% +/- 11.23%) and by 4-CM (21.72% +/- 9.42%) were different, but there was a strong relationship between the 2 methods (R2 = 0.85). DXA underestimated %BF in subjects with lower %BF and overestimated it in those with higher %BF. The relationship between the 2 methods was not affected by gender, age, ethnicity, pubertal stage, height, weight, or body mass index. The standard error of the estimate was 3.66%. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates a predictable relationship between DXA and 4-CM for %BF measurement. Because of its ease of use, consistent relationship with 4-CM, and availability, we propose that DXA has the capacity for clinical application including prediction of metabolic abnormalities associated with excess %BF in pediatrics.
OBJECTIVE: Pediatricians are encountering body composition information more frequently, with percentage of body fat (%BF) measurement receiving particular attention as a result of the obesity epidemic. One confounding issue is that different methods may yield different %BF results in the same person. The objective of this study was to compare dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with the criterion 4-compartment model (4-CM) for measurement of %BF in a large pediatric cohort and to assist pediatricians in appropriate interpretation of body composition information by recognizing differences between techniques. METHODS: Height, weight, anthropometrics, body density by underwater weighing, total body water by deuterium dilution, and bone mineral content and %BF by DXA (Lunar DPX/DPX-L) were measured in 411 healthy subjects, aged 6 to 18 years. Values for %BF by 4-CM and DXA were compared using regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean +/- standard deviation values for %BF by DXA (22.73% +/- 11.23%) and by 4-CM (21.72% +/- 9.42%) were different, but there was a strong relationship between the 2 methods (R2 = 0.85). DXA underestimated %BF in subjects with lower %BF and overestimated it in those with higher %BF. The relationship between the 2 methods was not affected by gender, age, ethnicity, pubertal stage, height, weight, or body mass index. The standard error of the estimate was 3.66%. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates a predictable relationship between DXA and 4-CM for %BF measurement. Because of its ease of use, consistent relationship with 4-CM, and availability, we propose that DXA has the capacity for clinical application including prediction of metabolic abnormalities associated with excess %BF in pediatrics.
Authors: S B Heymsfield; S Lichtman; R N Baumgartner; J Wang; Y Kamen; A Aliprantis; R N Pierson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1990-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Robyn E Karlage; Carmen L Wilson; Nan Zhang; Sue Kaste; Daniel M Green; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Wassim Chemaitilly; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Melissa M Hudson; Kirsten K Ness Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Susanna Stenevi-Lundgren; Robin M Daly; Christian Lindén; Per Gärdsell; Magnus K Karlsson Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2008-11-19 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Christopher M Cirnigliaro; Michael F La Fountaine; Racine Emmons; Steven C Kirshblum; Pierre Asselin; Ann M Spungen; William A Bauman Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: M Wilkes; J Thornton; M Horlick; A Sopher; J Wang; E M Widen; R Pierson; D Gallagher Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Marsha Dowda; Sharon E Taverno Ross; Kerry L McIver; Rodney K Dishman; Russell R Pate Journal: Child Obes Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: J C K Wells; D Haroun; J E Williams; C Wilson; T Darch; R M Viner; S Eaton; M S Fewtrell Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 5.095