Literature DB >> 2360552

Body composition of humans: comparison of two improved four-compartment models that differ in expense, technical complexity, and radiation exposure.

S B Heymsfield1, S Lichtman, R N Baumgartner, J Wang, Y Kamen, A Aliprantis, R N Pierson.   

Abstract

Multicompartment models are of growing importance in the study of body composition in humans. This study compares two improved four-compartment (water, protein, mineral, and fat) models that differ in expense, technological complexity, and radiation exposure. Primary data (from 31 subjects) for the first model were derived by dual-photon absorptiometry, 3H2O dilution, and hydrodensitometry and for the second model by delayed and prompt gamma neutron-activation analysis and 3H2O dilution. Estimates of fat, protein, and mineral from the first model were highly correlated with those from the second model (r = 0.98, 0.72, and 0.94, respectively; all p less than 0.001). The proportions of body weight represented by water, protein, mineral, and fat for the simpler first model (0.532, 0.155, 0.048, and 0.265) were similar to compartment fractions provided by the more complex and costly second model (0.532, 0.143, 0.046, and 0.279). Multicompartment body composition models can thus be developed from increasingly available techniques that compare favorably with similar results derived from limited-access instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2360552     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/52.1.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  34 in total

1.  Validation of a skinfold based index for tracking proportional changes in lean mass.

Authors:  G J Slater; G M Duthie; D B Pyne; W G Hopkins
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Validation of a 3-dimensional photonic scanner for the measurement of body volumes, dimensions, and percentage body fat.

Authors:  Jack Wang; Dympna Gallagher; John C Thornton; Wen Yu; Mary Horlick; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Comparison of three methods of nutritional assessment in liver cirrhosis: subjective global assessment, traditional nutritional parameters, and body composition analysis.

Authors:  Fátima A F Figueiredo; Renata M Perez; Márcia M Freitas; Mário Kondo
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Restoration of normal glucose tolerance in severely obese patients after bilio-pancreatic diversion: role of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function.

Authors:  A Mari; M Manco; C Guidone; G Nanni; M Castagneto; G Mingrone; E Ferrannini
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Bioenergetics and body compositional variables of humans.

Authors:  O E Owen; K G Powell; H Silberman
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1991

Review 6.  The assessment of body composition in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  M Y Morgan; A M Madden
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-02

7.  State of the science on cardiometabolic risk after spinal cord injury: recap of the 2013 Asia pre-conference on cardiometabolic disease.

Authors:  Manon Maitland Schladen; Suzanne L Groah
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2014

Review 8.  Multi-component molecular-level body composition reference methods: evolving concepts and future directions.

Authors:  S B Heymsfield; C B Ebbeling; J Zheng; A Pietrobelli; B J Strauss; A M Silva; D S Ludwig
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 9.213

9.  Postoperative changes in body composition after gastrectomy.

Authors:  Teruo Kiyama; Takashi Mizutani; Takeshi Okuda; Itsuro Fujita; Akira Tokunaga; Takashi Tajiri; Adrian Barbul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Effects of an oral ghrelin mimetic on body composition and clinical outcomes in healthy older adults: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ralf Nass; Suzan S Pezzoli; Mary Clancy Oliveri; James T Patrie; Frank E Harrell; Jody L Clasey; Steven B Heymsfield; Mark A Bach; Mary Lee Vance; Michael O Thorner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.