BACKGROUND: Overweight youth have greater bone mass than their healthy-weight peers but sustain more fractures. However, it is unclear whether and how excess body fat influences bone quality in youth. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether overweight status correlated with three-dimensional aspects of bone quality influencing bone strength in adolescent and young adult females and males. METHODS: We categorized males (n=103; mean age, 17 years) and females (n=85; mean age, 18 years) into healthy-weight and overweight groups. We measured lean mass (LM) and fat mass (FM) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We used high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT to assess the distal radius (7% site) and distal tibia (8% site). Bone quality measures included total bone mineral density (Tt.BMD), total area (Tt.Ar), trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), separation (Tb.Sp), and thickness (Tb.Th). We used multiple regression to compare bone quality between healthy-weight and overweight adolescents adjusting for age, ethnicity, limb length, LM, and FM. RESULTS: Overweight males had higher (10%-21%) Tt.BMD, BV/TV, and Tb.N and lower Tb.Sp at the tibia and lower Tt.Ar at the radius than healthy-weight males. No differences were observed between overweight and healthy-weight females. LM attenuated the differences in bone quality between groups in males while FM negatively predicted Tt.BMD, BV/TV, Tb.N, and Tb.Th. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest overweight males have enhanced bone quality compared with healthy-weight males; however, when group differences are interpreted in the context of the mechanostat theory, it appears bone quality of overweight adolescents adapts to LM and not to greater FM.
BACKGROUND: Overweight youth have greater bone mass than their healthy-weight peers but sustain more <span class="Disease">fractures. However, it is unclear whether and how excess body fat influences bone quality in youth. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether overweight status correlated with three-dimensional aspects of bone quality influencing bone strength in adolescent and young adult females and males. METHODS: We categorized males (n=103; mean age, 17 years) and females (n=85; mean age, 18 years) into healthy-weight and overweight groups. We measured lean mass (LM) and fat mass (FM) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We used high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT to assess the distal radius (7% site) and distal tibia (8% site). Bone quality measures included total bone mineral density (Tt.BMD), total area (Tt.Ar), trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), separation (Tb.Sp), and thickness (Tb.Th). We used multiple regression to compare bone quality between healthy-weight and overweight adolescents adjusting for age, ethnicity, limb length, LM, and FM. RESULTS: Overweight males had higher (10%-21%) Tt.BMD, BV/TV, and Tb.N and lower Tb.Sp at the tibia and lower Tt.Ar at the radius than healthy-weight males. No differences were observed between overweight and healthy-weight females. LM attenuated the differences in bone quality between groups in males while FM negatively predicted Tt.BMD, BV/TV, Tb.N, and Tb.Th. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest overweight males have enhanced bone quality compared with healthy-weight males; however, when group differences are interpreted in the context of the mechanostat theory, it appears bone quality of overweight adolescents adapts to LM and not to greater FM.
Authors: Alexandra Ackerman; John C Thornton; Jack Wang; Richard N Pierson; Mary Horlick Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Hongqiang Ma; Tuomas Turpeinen; Mika Silvennoinen; Sira Torvinen; Rita Rinnankoski-Tuikka; Heikki Kainulainen; Jussi Timonen; Urho M Kujala; Paavo Rahkila; Harri Suominen Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) Date: 2011-01-17 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Joseph M Kindler; Norman K Pollock; Hannah L Ross; Christopher M Modlesky; Harshvardhan Singh; Emma M Laing; Richard D Lewis Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Kelly Wilkinson; Dimitris Vlachopoulos; Panagiota Klentrou; Esther Ubago-Guisado; Augusto César Ferreira De Moraes; Alan R Barker; Craig A Williams; Luis A Moreno; Luis Gracia-Marco Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Megan Hetherington-Rauth; Jennifer W Bea; Robert M Blew; Janet L Funk; Melanie D Hingle; Vinson R Lee; Denise J Roe; Mark D Wheeler; Timothy G Lohman; Scott B Going Journal: Bone Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Kai-Li Deng; Wan-Yu Yang; Jin-Li Hou; Hui Li; Hao Feng; Su-Mei Xiao Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 3.390