Literature DB >> 15120071

Exogenous orienting of attention depends upon the ability to execute eye movements.

Daniel T Smith1, Chris Rorden, Stephen R Jackson.   

Abstract

Shifts of attention can be made overtly by moving the eyes or covertly with attention being allocated to a region of space that does not correspond to the current direction of gaze. However, the precise relationship between eye movements and the covert orienting of attention remains controversial. The influential premotor theory proposes that the covert orienting of attention is produced by the programming of (unexecuted) eye movements and thus predicts a strong relationship between the ability to execute eye movements and the operation of spatial attention. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that impaired spatial attention is observed in an individual (AI) who is neurologically healthy but who cannot execute eye movements as a result of a congenital impairment in the elasticity of her eye muscles. This finding provides direct support for the role of the eye-movement system in the covert orienting of attention and suggests that whereas intact cortical structures may be necessary for normal attentional reflexes, they are not sufficient. The ability to move our eyes is essential for the development of normal patterns of spatial attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15120071     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  28 in total

1.  Saccadic instabilities and voluntary saccadic behaviour.

Authors:  E Gowen; R V Abadi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Evidence for an attentional component in saccadic inhibition of return.

Authors:  David Souto; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  An intact eye-movement system is not required to generate inhibition of return.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 2.864

4.  Time course of motor preparation during visual search with flexible stimulus-response association.

Authors:  Husam A Katnani; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Fixation disengagement enhances peripheral perceptual processing: evidence for a perceptual gap effect.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Extraocular muscle afferent signals modulate visual attention.

Authors:  Daniela Balslev; William Newman; Paul C Knox
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Dynamic Interaction between Reinforcement Learning and Attention in Multidimensional Environments.

Authors:  Yuan Chang Leong; Angela Radulescu; Reka Daniel; Vivian DeWoskin; Yael Niv
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Visual target selection and motor planning define attentional enhancement at perceptual processing stages.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Tobias Heed; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The neural correlates of visuospatial perceptual and oculomotor extrapolation.

Authors:  Marc Tibber; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Simon Grant; Dean Melmoth; Geraint Rees; Michael Morgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Orienting auditory spatial attention engages frontal eye fields and medial occipital cortex in congenitally blind humans.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Daniel Schwartz; Alexander A Stevens
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-02-25       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.