Literature DB >> 23761901

Time course of motor preparation during visual search with flexible stimulus-response association.

Husam A Katnani1, Neeraj J Gandhi.   

Abstract

Whether allocation of visuospatial attention can be divorced from saccade preparation has been the subject of intense research efforts. A variant of the visual search paradigm, in which a feature singleton indicates that the correct saccade should be directed to it (prosaccade) or to the opposite distractor (antisaccade), has been influential in addressing this core topic. We performed a causal assessment of this controversy by delivering an air puff to one eye to invoke the trigeminal blink reflex as monkeys performed this visual search task. Blinks effectively remove saccadic inhibition and prematurely trigger impending saccades in reaction time tasks, thus providing a behavioral readout of the premotor plan. We found that saccades accompanied blinks during the initial allocation of attention epoch and that these movements were directed to the singleton for both prosaccade and antisaccade trials. Blinks evoked at later times were accompanied with saccades to the correct end point location: the singleton on prosaccade trials and the opposite distractor on antisaccade trials. These results provide support for concurrent encoding of visuospatial attention and saccade preparation during visual search behavior.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23761901      PMCID: PMC3682383          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0850-13.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  82 in total

1.  Activity of the brain stem omnipause neurons during saccades perturbed by stimulation of the primate superior colliculus.

Authors:  N J Gandhi; E L Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Saccade preparation is required for exogenous attention but not endogenous attention or IOR.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Thomas Schenk; Chris Rorden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Understanding how the brain changes its mind: microstimulation in the macaque frontal eye field reveals how saccade plans are changed.

Authors:  Arjun Ramakrishnan; Ramakrishnan Sureshbabu; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Updating the premotor theory: the allocation of attention is not always accompanied by saccade preparation.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  The Premotor theory of attention: time to move on?

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The global effect for antisaccades.

Authors:  Jayalakshmi Viswanathan; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  From salience to saccades: multiple-alternative gated stochastic accumulator model of visual search.

Authors:  Braden A Purcell; Jeffrey D Schall; Gordon D Logan; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Competition for visual selection in the oculomotor system.

Authors:  David A Markowitz; Ryan A Shewcraft; Yan T Wong; Bijan Pesaran
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  M1 corticospinal mirror neurons and their role in movement suppression during action observation.

Authors:  Ganesh Vigneswaran; Roland Philipp; Roger N Lemon; Alexander Kraskov
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  6 in total

1.  Alteration of the microsaccadic velocity-amplitude main sequence relationship after visual transients: implications for models of saccade control.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Chih-Yang Chen; Xiaoguang Tian; Saad Idrees; Thomas A Münch; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Instantaneous Midbrain Control of Saccade Velocity.

Authors:  Ivan Smalianchuk; Uday K Jagadisan; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Removal of inhibition uncovers latent movement potential during preparation.

Authors:  Uday K Jagadisan; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Saccadic inhibition interrupts ongoing oculomotor activity to enable the rapid deployment of alternate movement plans.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Voluntary and involuntary contributions to perceptually guided saccadic choices resolved with millisecond precision.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Benjamin R Steinberg; Lauren A Sussman; Sophia M Fry; Christopher K Hauser; Denise D Anderson; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Visual attention is not deployed at the endpoint of averaging saccades.

Authors:  Luca Wollenberg; Heiner Deubel; Martin Szinte
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.