Literature DB >> 15111386

Dynamic receptor team formation can explain the high signal transduction gain in Escherichia coli.

Réka Albert1, Yu-Wen Chiu, Hans G Othmer.   

Abstract

Evolution has provided many organisms with sophisticated sensory systems that enable them to respond to signals in their environment. The response frequently involves alteration in the pattern of movement, either by directed movement, a process called taxis, or by altering the speed or frequency of turning, which is called kinesis. Chemokinesis has been most thoroughly studied in the peritrichous bacterium Escherichia coli, which has four helical flagella distributed over the cell surface, and swims by rotating them. When rotated counterclockwise the flagella coalesce into a propulsive bundle, producing a relatively straight "run," and when rotated clockwise they fly apart, resulting in a "tumble" which reorients the cell with little translocation. A stochastic process generates the runs and tumbles, and in a chemoeffector gradient, runs that carry the cell in a favorable direction are extended. The cell senses spatial gradients as temporal changes in receptor occupancy and changes the probability of counterclockwise rotation (the bias) on a fast timescale, but adaptation returns the bias to baseline on a slow timescale, enabling the cell to detect and respond to further concentration changes. The overall structure of the signal transduction pathways is well characterized in E. coli, but important details are still not understood. Only recently has a source of gain in the signal transduction network been identified experimentally, and here we present a mathematical model based on dynamic assembly of receptor teams that can explain this observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15111386      PMCID: PMC1304138          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74321-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  24 in total

Review 1.  Signal transduction pathways involving protein phosphorylation in prokaryotes.

Authors:  R B Bourret; K A Borkovich; M I Simon
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 2.  Stimulus response coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: receptor dimers in signalling arrays.

Authors:  M N Levit; Y Liu; J B Stock
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks.

Authors:  N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J E Segall; S M Block; H C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity.

Authors:  D Bray; M D Levin; C J Morton-Firth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Normal-to-curly flagellar transitions and their role in bacterial tumbling. Stabilization of an alternative quaternary structure by mechanical force.

Authors:  R M Macnab; M K Ornston
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Bacteria swim by rotating their flagellar filaments.

Authors:  H C Berg; R A Anderson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell.

Authors:  J R Maddock; L Shapiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  S M Block; J E Segall; H C Berg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Quantitative modeling of sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis: the role of coupling among different chemoreceptor species.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 12.779

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effect of chemoreceptor modification on assembly and activity of the receptor-kinase complex in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Louisa Liberman; Howard C Berg; Victor Sourjik
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Chemosensing in Escherichia coli: two regimes of two-state receptors.

Authors:  Juan E Keymer; Robert G Endres; Monica Skoge; Yigal Meir; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Physical responses of bacterial chemoreceptors.

Authors:  Ady Vaknin; Howard C Berg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  The source of high signal cooperativity in bacterial chemosensory arrays.

Authors:  Germán E Piñas; Vered Frank; Ady Vaknin; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: evidence for strongly coupled clusters.

Authors:  Monica L Skoge; Robert G Endres; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Flower development as an interplay between dynamical physical fields and genetic networks.

Authors:  Rafael Ángel Barrio; Aurora Hernández-Machado; C Varea; José Roberto Romero-Arias; Elena Alvarez-Buylla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An agent-based model of signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Jameson Miller; Miles Parker; Robert B Bourret; Morgan C Giddings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A "trimer of dimers"-based model for the chemotactic signal transduction network in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Xiangrong Xin; Hans G Othmer
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  Excitation and adaptation in bacteria-a model signal transduction system that controls taxis and spatial pattern formation.

Authors:  Hans G Othmer; Xiangrong Xin; Chuan Xue
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.