Literature DB >> 16565056

Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: evidence for strongly coupled clusters.

Monica L Skoge1, Robert G Endres, Ned S Wingreen.   

Abstract

Receptor coupling is believed to explain the high sensitivity of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis network to small changes in levels of chemoattractant. We compare in detail the activity response of coupled two-state receptors for different models of receptor coupling: weakly-coupled extended one-dimensional and two-dimensional lattice models and the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model of isolated strongly-coupled clusters. We identify features in recent data that distinguish between the models. Specifically, researchers have measured the receptor activity response to steps of chemoattractant for a variety of engineered E. coli strains using in vivo fluorescence resonance energy transfer. We find that the fluorescence resonance energy transfer results for wild-type and for a low-activity mutant are inconsistent with the lattice models of receptor coupling, but consistent with the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model of receptor coupling, suggesting that receptors form isolated strongly-coupled clusters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16565056      PMCID: PMC1471836          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.079905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  34 in total

1.  Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Howard C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Localization of components of the chemotaxis machinery of Escherichia coli using fluorescent protein fusions.

Authors:  V Sourjik; H C Berg
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Hanbin Mao; Paul S Cremer; Michael D Manson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Receptor methylation controls the magnitude of stimulus-response coupling in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Mikhail N Levit; Jeffry B Stock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A spatially extended stochastic model of the bacterial chemotaxis signalling pathway.

Authors:  Thomas S Shimizu; Sergej V Aksenov; Dennis Bray
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Atomic-force microscopy: Rhodopsin dimers in native disc membranes.

Authors:  Dimitrios Fotiadis; Yan Liang; Slawomir Filipek; David A Saperstein; Andreas Engel; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  CheZ phosphatase localizes to chemoreceptor patches via CheA-short.

Authors:  Brian J Cantwell; Roger R Draheim; Richard B Weart; Cameran Nguyen; Richard C Stewart; Michael D Manson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Evidence that both ligand binding and covalent adaptation drive a two-state equilibrium in the aspartate receptor signaling complex.

Authors:  J A Bornhorst; J J Falke
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Collaborative signaling by mixed chemoreceptor teams in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Peter Ames; Claudia A Studdert; Rebecca H Reiser; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Intrinsic lattice formation by the ryanodine receptor calcium-release channel.

Authors:  C C Yin; F A Lai
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 28.824

View more
  30 in total

1.  A dynamic-signaling-team model for chemotaxis receptors in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Clinton H Hansen; Victor Sourjik; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors.

Authors:  Leonid A Mirny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Physical limits on cellular sensing of spatial gradients.

Authors:  Bo Hu; Wen Chen; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Herbert Levine
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Physical responses of bacterial chemoreceptors.

Authors:  Ady Vaknin; Howard C Berg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through "assistance neighborhoods".

Authors:  Robert G Endres; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Self-assembly of receptor/signaling complexes in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Peter M Wolanin; Melinda D Baker; Noreen R Francis; Dennis R Thomas; David J DeRosier; Jeffry B Stock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effects of adaptation in maintaining high sensitivity over a wide range of backgrounds for Escherichia coli chemotaxis.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Upward mobility and alternative lifestyles: a report from the 10th biennial meeting on Bacterial Locomotion and Signal Transduction.

Authors:  Birgit E Scharf; Phillip D Aldridge; John R Kirby; Brian R Crane
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  A minimal model for metabolism-dependent chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides (†).

Authors:  Sisi Fan; Robert G Endres
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 10.  Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: signal amplification and accurate adaptation.

Authors:  Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.