Literature DB >> 6760985

Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis.

S M Block, J E Segall, H C Berg.   

Abstract

The chemotactic behavior of Escherichia coli has been studied by exposing cells tethered by a single flagellum to pulses of chemicals delivered iontophoretically. Normally, wild-type cells spin alternately clockwise and counterclockwise, changing their direction on the average approximately once per second. When cells were exposed to a very brief diffusive wave of attractant, the probability of spinning counterclockwise quickly peaked, then fell below the prestimulus value, returning to baseline within a few seconds; repellent responses were similar but inverted. The width of the response indicates that cells integrate sensory inputs over a period of seconds, while the biphasic character implies that they also take time derivatives of these inputs. The sensory system is maximally tuned to concentration changes that occur over a span of approximately 2 sec, an interval over which changes normally occur when cells swim in spatial gradients; it is optimized to extract information from signals subject to statistical fluctuation. Impulse responses of cells defective in methylation were similar to those of wild-type cells, but did not fall as far below the baseline, indicating a partial defect in adaptation. Impulse responses of cheZ mutants were aberrant, indicating a serious defect in excitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6760985     DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90421-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  122 in total

1.  Efficient adaptational demethylation of chemoreceptors requires the same enzyme-docking site as efficient methylation.

Authors:  A N Barnakov; L A Barnakova; G L Hazelbauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  PAS domain residues involved in signal transduction by the Aer redox sensor of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Repik; A Rebbapragada; M S Johnson; J O Haznedar; I B Zhulin; B L Taylor
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Characterization of photodamage to Escherichia coli in optical traps.

Authors:  K C Neuman; E H Chadd; G F Liou; K Bergman; S M Block
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Computerized analysis of chemotaxis at different stages of bacterial growth.

Authors:  J F Staropoli; U Alon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Microfluidic technologies for temporal perturbations of chemotaxis.

Authors:  Daniel Irimia
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

6.  Behavioral responses of Rhodobacter sphaeroides to linear gradients of the nutrients succinate and acetate.

Authors:  H L Packer; J P Armitage
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  New motion analysis system for characterization of the chemosensory response kinetics of Rhodobacter sphaeroides under different growth conditions.

Authors:  Mila Kojadinovic; Antoine Sirinelli; George H Wadhams; Judith P Armitage
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Crosslinking snapshots of bacterial chemoreceptor squads.

Authors:  Claudia A Studdert; John S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The fast tumble signal in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Shahid Khan; Sanjay Jain; Gordon P Reid; David R Trentham
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Effects of receptor interaction in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Bernardo A Mello; Leah Shaw; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.